The results of a new study presented at the 51st Congress of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) reveal that patients and doctors perceive the control of diabetes differently.
The study concludes that approaching these positions would be beneficial for medical-patient communication and improve the management of this disease.
This study, called Control Perceptions (POC), shows that adults with non -controlled type 2 diabetes with basal insulin have a broader conception of the term "Diabetes Control", perceive greater obstacles to maintaining this andThey consider that their life is significantly more affected by the disease than doctors think.
“There is a significant gap in the perception of the control of diabetes between doctors and patients in relation to how they define it, with what obstacles are to maintain it and how it affects the fact of not having properly controlled basal insulin to everyday lifeof patients, ”explains Meryl Brod, principal researcher at the POC study.A more open dialogue during consultations can provide a clearer vision of these critical factors, which would improve diabetes management and develop more effective individualized treatment plans. ”
The study identified that doctors define the control of diabetes in clinical and measurable terms, such as the frequency/severity of hypoglycemia (93% of doctors vs. 69% of patients, P&R 0.001), complications associated withDiabetes (89% vs. 75%, P&T 0.001) and the level of glycosylated hemoglobin or HBA1C (85% vs. 79%, P&T 0.05) compared to not controlled patients with basal insulin.
Although these terms are important for people with type 2 diabetes, their definition of control presents a much broader approach than that of doctors and includes the amount of insulin (units) that must be administered to (78% of patients vs 29%of the doctors, P&R 0.001), the energy levels (75% vs. 33%, P & lt; 0.001) and to what extent they have to be aware of their illness (68% vs 31%, P&T 0.001), among other factors.
People with non -controlled type 2 diabetes with basal insulin perceive more obstacles to achieve control of diabetes than doctors;Among them they mention stress (75% vs 54%, P&T 0.001), the side effects of medication (70% vs 56%, P&T 0.001) and the lack of support groups for patients (56% vs. 11%,P&T 0.001).
Patients take into account the impact of not being controlled with basal insulin and the way in which this interferes with their lives in a significantly greater than doctors.In this impact they include issues such as mood/emotions (63% of patients vs 33% of doctors, P & LT; 0.001), the possibility of making plans (62% vs. 16%, P&R 0.001) and tasks and taskswhich can be carried out during the day (62% vs. 23% P&T 0.001), among other factors.