Free has good things, of course ... eg, you comment on the issue of readings that are lost in others, and not in free, which for me is an advance and something that others should copy (¿Because losing that data if you have a stuck trnasion?) And effectively lose that data, if it is for a while, it implies that when you recover "you start again" from 0 to generate trends.That "defect" is more evident in the Seven Plus with its "scarce" scope (and as the transmitter spends, more), but for example, the G4 with its 6 meters, which are more, is more difficult to happen,But I insist, it is something rectifiable and should store the data as free, they can and should.And as soon as you connect to the receiver, download them suddenly, so that last bull does not matter what you had (I don't care what I have had) but you will continue to show more real values and with the arrow.
That said ... Why is Flash required more?First, because it costs money (and not little, and that others are a robbery, it does not imply that this is another robbery, smaller, but robbery), we return to that if it is free, quiet and enjoy it, as if the patches are frompink and wear drawn hearts ... free?I don't care.
Second, because we have been in the market for 7 years, 7 years of margin to offer us ... basically, nothing.Eye, a lot, compared to glucose strips, of course, but "nothing" compared to what we already had.And above, they dare to sell "novelty" somewhat super-obsoleto (7 years, I insist).
Of course, here the third point enters, marketing (that will know a little, it consists) ... it is of no use to have a wonderful product that nobody knows it ... and the Abbott, with a powerful laboratory andIntroduced into our country and others, presentation campaigns, endocrine from behind giving lectures ... it will get something that Dexcom has never raised, because he cares about a European pepper (here there are mere "importers").Free will succeed because it will be known, and also, they will put it in the SS with shoe, because they want (benefit) and because they can.
There is an interesting film for technology lovers ... Pirates of Sillicon Valley, where in the end, there is a conversation (when Mr. Gates gave Steve Jobs, Apple) that can be applied here:
Steve Jobs: We are better than you, we have better products!
Bill Gates: You don't understand Steve ... that doesn't matter!
Years later things changed ... but it is an example that a good product does not guarantee you anything.Dexcom I think they have it, but in the USA.And moreover, I dare to say that in the use of the free Abbott, he will not want the tato ... that is, those who have continuous measurement paid for their insurance, you will see how many ask the Abbott ... moreover, I would not surprise methat I do not even be bothered to sell it there ... so that ... because he has continuous measurement pays for his insurance, and they put the "free" ... he lies.
Dexcom against Abbott has nothing to do ... or things change here, but nothing.At first I thought that the flash, if it were really cheap (which is not) would hurt Dexcom (it is a say, because again, few users are really, Dexcom cares about a whip Europe, and that we don'tI miss that there comes a time to "abandon", as an importer see that it does not interest ... see you later), but if people have to pay what they ask, it can even be advertising for Dexcom, when they see that "paying a littlemore "get more benefits.
Honestly, I think the flash is very good, but for me, it is not worth what it costs, and more with 7 years to develop a product and that in the end they sell it, expensive and manco.The minimum they could do, was to sell to 60 euros sensor, lasting 14 days, and with alarms, a real continuous measurement.The minimum.But calm ... that the Navigator II will be atThe return of the corner (but this "return to the corner" different from the "cure" of diabetes), and that yes ... that is going to be the equivalent of the Dexcom, surely much better, and surely more economical (or no, but better).
For all this, personally, I am very critical, and I demand.And more when I see the advertising that is given (marketing) that now seems to be "the bomb", you go to a pharmacy and "hallucinate in colors" with this new device (to see a lady ... that I have been with thedexcom¡¡¡¡).It will succeed, because they will "put it" ... but that is good, to see if people find out that there are "more complete" options (I do not say better) and on top of when someone discovers that 7 years ago I couldHaving a continuous meter is going to get quite angry.
Ahhh, and Dexcom of course it is demanded ... and if you think about my criticisms, because ... G4 served to get a petroleum jelly (speaking badly), many presentations, very beautiful ... but you do the same and more expensive.Pos ok.
For me, it is a pity that Dexcom is not called for Ex, Roche or Lifescan ... because then, 4-5 years ago, it is possible that it was already in the SS ... but while Dexcom is Dexcom .... aExclusive continuous measurement company, settled in the USA (where it sweeps), then ...
Do you think we will see the Civil Guard with Pontiacs, Os Cadillacs, although it costs the same like a Citroen C5, or a Renault Laguna?
Well here Dexcom is Pontiac ... that some are seen ... brought by some "crazy" ... and I don't know if it is better or worse than a Citroen (it is an example) but here in that plan, it will not succeed.
And within 1 year, if someone comes to tell me that the "free" is great, notice that the SS begins to study to pay ... something that does not happen with others ... well ... I shut up.
The free is very good when it is free, and it will not be good for being good and then they put it for free ... it will be good because they put it for free, which is very different.
And that many people will use it, it will not be because it is "better", it will be because it has been announced.
How many diabetics do you know that they know something about Dexcom?To those who teach it ... in a pharmacy ... to which you tell you that it exists ... and even to ambulatory doctors ...
There is a total ignorance.However ... some have heard that there are dogs that detect hypoglycemia (often circus), why?Because it has come out in the press, on radio, on television, I have seen signs of conferences about them .... pathetic.
Anyway ... 7 years later ... they go and take out a smartphone now, but they sell it so well that we have to "hallucinate" with the novelty ... Do you imagine it?Well, it's what they do.And to top it off, they will get it (because the alternative, its marketing here, and in Europe, is 0).
greetings