Yes, the truth is that we are somewhat overwhelmed with the subject because we know the risks (at least those of "manual").But what I wonder is to what extent these risks are a reality, for example looking at this graph:
For those who are not 100% with English, I try a rapid translation :
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The frequency of defects in the development of the fetus in diabetic pregnancies is significantly higher compared to uncomplicated pregnancies
In infants born to diabetic mothers, malformations are found in 2.7-16.8% , while in that birth of healthy mothers who were only in babies 2-3%
The first fetal development period, that is, the organogenesis period (up to week 12 of gestation), is especially vulnerable to teratogenic factors - teratogenic factors during this period can cause mostly large congenital defects, mainly of the central nervous system (CNS), the cardiovascular (SCV), skeletal, and urogenital.
Results of numerous studies show that the incidence of congenital defects is much more frequent in infants born to mothers who came with blood glucose increased during the first trimester of pregnancy
Risk of malformations in a group of mothers newborns in varied with respect to HBA1C
If the HBA1C level , during the first quarter of pregnancy do not exceed 8.5% the risk of malformations was 3.4%
If the maternal HBA1C from the first quarter exceeded 9.5% , then this was related to a risk of 22.0% of the malformations .
about the risk of malformations in the sense of blood glucose:
In a female diabetic population with an average of glycemia 163 mg / dl (9.1 mmol / l), the risk of fetal malformation is 9.6%, while in which, with an average glycemia of 110 mg /dl (6.1 mmol / l) The risk is reduced to 3.9%
Maintain fasting glucose levels in the first quarter below 5.8 mmol / L and postprandial glucose levels below 9.1 mmol / L can contribute to the decrease in the number of fetal malformations
Keep in mind that pregnancy diabetes, despite the improvement of metabolic control, remains a strong risk factor for fetal development alterations, particularly in patients with a tendency to fragile blood glucose during the first trimester of pregnancy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here I return: if we consider 22% as a high risk (which is) we would be talking about people with + 9.5% HBA1C the first quarter.But 8.5 % HBA1C reduces risk considerably.
I understand 100% that the doctor should always try to reduce the risk to the maximum, but to raise an abortion when there is a 78% chance that everything goes well seems very extreme.
The mother of my partner is diabetic and in her family there are 3 brothers, her mother (30 years ago) did not take control over her diabetes like today during her pregnancy because the possibilities were not the same.
And the 3 children who have left healthy and without problems (my partner developed diabetes just 4 years ago, so we did not blame him for the pregnancy of his mother ... :))
In turn, I suppose that many diabetic mothers in theAfter they have had to go for that trance ... we are not somewhat confused with such negativity on the subject ...
I do not encourage anyone to skip the rules that your endocrine puts you to have a baby, because you believe me, we are not having a good time, but we are trying to be positive.