I don't see conspiracy, what I see is, benefits at our expense and that play with our health.:-/
In my town this is called contradiction.
I do not propaganda, I swear.I've been trying to get used to Stevia for a year, but I don't get it.Little by little.
Another contradiction, maybe you don't see it but you are spreading from the Stevia.
You speak evil of sweeteners such as aspartamo or cyclamate without any data or foundation and you speak well of sweeteners such as the tagatose or the stevia (also without any data or foundation) when you can find favorable things and unfavorable things, however you decide happily.Propagar conspiracy theories against the first two: "Aspartamo and cyclamate are bad ..." "They poison us ..." "They earn money to our coast ..." "That each one does what they consider appropriate ..I continue in my thirteen ... "
The Run Run in the background is still "the natural is good, the synthetic is bad."Who has told you that the tagatosa or the stevia that reaches your hands is natural?Do you plants the Stevia seeds yourself in your particular garden?If so ... those seeds that you use in your particular garden are natural or are manipulated (transgenic) seeds?Do you personally inspect each and every intermediate processes?
I love to meet someone who has a more or less hypochondriac behavior like yours, there is always something to worry about ... Well, we are going to "feed" those concerns that you like so much and in view that you speak positively about Stevia(Without any fact or foundation) when there is, as with any product, information for and against it we go with it:
Stevia has been prohibited for years in many countries, the prohibition in Europe has risen as who says four days ago (but to help the negative conspiracy theories against Stevia now it's time to finish the phrase with something like) butStatus prohibited by something will be ... (important to finish the phrase with suspensive points to let the reader's imagination fly, also note the use of majority to penetrate the collective subconscious).
One puts in a search engine "Stevia contraindications" "Stevia prohibition" or similar can be found theories of all kinds, including:
-"Evidence of genotoxicity (for example, is able to change genetic information) in some of the Stevia components."
-"Stevia and sterility: the Guaraní indigenous people of this area of Paraguay as in southern Brazil use" ka'a he'ê "(" sweet sheet "), as it is called in Guaraní, from hundreds of years as an edulcorant in theirYerba mate, and in several tribes the use of this plant was reported in the control of women's fertility, applying concentrated infusions of Stevia for prolonged times. "
I do not know ... all these things give to think ... (important to use many suspensive points, that the reader lets his imagination fly).
Then to the "light" of the new "data" What will we do now?You come talking about a product and someone goes and find negative data ... Are you going to continue using Stevia after all these "evidence"?Are you going to continue recommending Stevia?: Oops:
Post data: That it is recorded that it has only been an example and that the example I just made with the stevia can be done with any product, anyone! It is just to put a name and "contraindications" or "prohibition" and one and oneFind that and more.
Post data 2: That no one takes seriously any of the nonsense of this post.
No signature configured, update it from user's profile.