Well, Alea, I have always had dogs, specifically German shepherds.The one I have currently lives in the garden of my house, has a lot of place inside the closure.And I leave the kkitas through the field ahead, well done on the other hand that also pays.I do not live inside my house, nor have I ever had such a dog (it will depend on the life of each one).
And take it to work, I can tell you hundreds of jobs that I do not imagine an employee/worker with a dog next to: dependent on any shopping center, official, administrative, programmer or engineer in a consultant, doctor, surgeon, nurse, mason, mechanic, traveler ... I see very unlikely to enjoy the company of a dog in your work (which I also say, many dogs are better than people).
I know they can go by plane, and go to the bathroom, and sleep with their owners.Even go by motorcycle (yes, yes, anyone dares).But my message did not go as a criticism of the "dogs", and if you have understood it, or expressed myself badly or you have confused yourself.Dogs, like children, only do what they teach them.The problem I have seen is that today, they dare to finance "the Lazarillo dog of a diabetic", but do not do so with a Dexcom, when its excellent functioning is demonstrated and that brings much more to diabetes than a dogAble to detect hypoglycemia.
It simply seems a delay, and almost embarrassing.I would look good that they finance the Dexcom, and the one who does not want it, because a dog, ok, there each one.That we are talking about diabetes, not many other qualities that a dog can have (which, by the way, I like them, but ... And the diabetics who do not like dogs?).And we have asked the neighbors -who lives in a floor -, which does not care if we are diabetic -it is our problem -if it bothers or offends that our "can" start to bark when we have or go tohave hypoglycemia, at 2 or 3 in the morning?
That is, if I can't use it in my life newspaper (and I think most people could not), it is not "discreet", it is intrusive ... when there are devices that integrate into your life without problems,Why do they "put them"?or more serious, how do you dare to finance them?
As for maintenance, yes, it is cheaper (the purchase seen what has been seen, nooooooooooooo) and serves more things, but none related to diabetes which is what we deal with, right?
In summary, that my opinion is that I do not see meaning, and many problems, for a "system" that does nothing better than a simple dexcom, and that it is in accordance with the times (not the economy).
And to put some humor, there is another new ecological system based on animals to measure blood:
Link S. Tyle = "max-width: 300px;
The animal extracts 2 samples, if it is rang, the glucose level is high, if the hair is put to tip, low, and if it continues to suck, it simply is hungry.
Eye: Incompatible with hypoglycemia detector dogs.: D
Price, 15000 euros, and will finance 60%.
Greetings