@Cacharro is not so complicated.
If I started with LibreLink, you should have the measurements continuous and not have to use the NFC (put the mobile on the sensor).
You will have to go to the application configuration and give all the permits, you must have the Bluetooth option disabled.
@Sherpa41 to me an application that cannot be calibrate, it is not worth it.I just released my first free 2 plus and goes as bad as the free 2. In 2 days it deviates 20 below and 30 above, randomly.I don't see differences.
The free freestyle reader continues to give better approach to the capillary than LibreLink.
I still start with the reader and monitoring with Diabox.FreeLink for me is residual.
I have to say that LibreLink started using free 1, in 2017, when in Spain there was no option.I lowered it from a Belgian server and was great with 1. Calibrated it with Glimp.
I do not understand why they do not improve the algorithm and equate it to that of the reader that is much better.
Since 2016 that I use sensors, my glycosilada has not risen from 6. But because caliber, FreeLink always gives superior values to my glycemic reality, the PGS indicator of Diabox nails it.
Lada enero 2015.
Uso Toujeo y Novorapid.
@Ruthbia we have discussed it several times and if some seem to you better.I miss me, because the only sensor that was not adjusted (30 that I have used) was the one that I always use with Diabox.Also in all the sensors that I used it, I never managed to let me know of a hiccup, instead freeLink from 24h it is perfect, always, nailed with my gluconteros.
In fact, today when I see a deviation, I take another glucometer and the one that was right was free not the glucometer.
I alreadyho much more freely than of the glucometer.With which to calibrate it seems to me nonsense.And more with the terribly bad and complicated system of Diabox.
En 1922 descubrieron la insulina, en 1930 la insulina lenta. ¿Que c*** han hecho desde entonces?
@Sherpa41 said:
@Ruthbia we have discussed it several times and if some seem to you better.I miss me, because the only sensor that was not adjusted (30 that I have used) was the one that I always use with Diabox.Also in all the sensors that I used it, I never managed to let me know of a hiccup, instead freeLink from 24h it is perfect, always, nailed with my gluconteros.
In fact, today when I see a deviation, I take another glucometer and the one that was right was free not the glucometer.
I alreadyho much more freely than of the glucometer.With which to calibrate it seems to me nonsense.And more with the terribly bad and complicated system of Diabox.
Look what the plus does, and you'll see that it is little precise.If you do not calibrate, do not approximate the glycemic reality.
Lada enero 2015.
Uso Toujeo y Novorapid.
@Ruthbia said:
@Sherpa41 said:
@Ruthbia we have discussed it several times and if some seem to you better.I miss me, because the only sensor that was not adjusted (30 that I have used) was the one that I always use with Diabox.Also in all the sensors that I used it, I never managed to let me know of a hiccup, instead freeLink from 24h it is perfect, always, nailed with my gluconteros.
In fact, today when I see a deviation, I take another glucometer and the one that was right was free not the glucometer.
I alreadyho much more freely than of the glucometer.With which to calibrate it seems to me nonsense.And more with the terribly bad and complicated system of Diabox.
Look what the plus does, and you'll see that it is little precise.If you do not calibrate, do not approximate the glycemic reality.
We talk about 33mg/dl of difference between the ABBott app measured by NFC.The 178 are from the NFC glucometer, and the capillary gives 213.
In Diabox, calibrated, for Bluetooth I was 203.
Lada enero 2015.
Uso Toujeo y Novorapid.
That you compare it with just a glucometer has no value.As I tell you, lately and especially the freestyle glucometer fail.I always have 3 glucometers of several brands, prepared for when one of them deviates a lot from the sensor, so I take another glucometer, put the blood and usually get closer to the value of the sensor, than to the other glucometer.
One of the ones I have to compare is the freestyle glucometer, but lately it does not seem reliable, I have ever seen variations of up to almost 100 points with the other two glucometers (and with the sensor), so when the strips are over, I will discard it forever, in favor of the contour Next.They said here that it was more precise.Let's see how ...
En 1922 descubrieron la insulina, en 1930 la insulina lenta. ¿Que c*** han hecho desde entonces?
Good morning everyone
It promised to be a free class of technology for a diabetic, also retired and quite denied for these issues.It started very clear, with the NFC and the Bluethoth, but the more comments I have read, the more it has been complicated everything.That if reading continues, that if alarm, that if it acts with the reader, with the mobile.In the end, I think, that I have quite complicated my days with the doses, sites, rations and others to get angry with all this.
I always start the sensor, with the meter, and then if I want to read with the mobile approximate and point.But the first, the meter, for being more manageable and reliable, apart from that it carries its glucometer, to contrast.
I do not know that Diabox.I called Abbott to ask them and they came to say that it was something alien to the system, like I forgot about that story.And I do that.So I don't want problems, I don't want Diabox.
I think, if I remember correctly, that @ruthbia does something similar.If not, to correct me.
Greetings and happy Sunday to everyone
Desde 1984 diabético tipo 1
Tresiba al mediodía , Apidra en las comidas.
Glicosiladas alrededor de 6,5 %
" Lo que más nos perjudica es que vivimos, no al dictado de nuestra razón , sino según las ajenas costumbres. "
Séneca
Ja ha ja ja.tranquility. Then each one has to learn and put into practice what best understands and domine.oyer changes the sensor but start again with the meter (until the analysis does the day 20). After starting with the meter, the Mòvil Acerquè the Mòvil to see what I told me ... and said this: "The sensor is already initiated to confirm" ... more or less.Mobile application when it is already left over it as long as they work well (and if so .... do not meneallo). By the same way respecting and learning from other foreros that have a "opinion and proceeding different." Safe.
No signature configured, add it on your user's profile.
The truth is that recommending Diabox (a quite complicated app) to someone who already has a hard time using LibreLink, does not seem the best option.
And that of telling you to Abbot ... XD is a fairly illegal application and very persecuted by them.Sometimes they have threatened this forum for talking about him.
If the reader is doing well, then.I see the only thing that I see him, is that as you have to scan you do not obsess so much to look at glucose.But in the long run everyone goes to the mobile.
En 1922 descubrieron la insulina, en 1930 la insulina lenta. ¿Que c*** han hecho desde entonces?
The reader is more comfortable than the mobile to read, it is faster, the mobile faces.
For years it could not be measured continuously, neither with a reader nor with mobile and nothing happened, you do not obsess.Cogs routines.
Each one must use whatever do well and consider that it has good control.
Lada enero 2015.
Uso Toujeo y Novorapid.
