New patch for glucose control

Do you know about the subject ?? Link

Everything that is for our benefit, welcome!
But I ... until I see it in the market, or financed ...

jordiv said:
Do you know about the subject? Link

At the end of what is talking about the sensors ...

Isabelbota said:

jordiv said:
do you know about the subject? Link

At the end of what is talking about the sensors ....

Comment that it is a strip, stuck to the skin that works with laser and measures sweat, blablabla ... It is not a bad idea, to see if it evolves ...

jordiv said:
Do you know about the subject? Link

It shows that the one who has written the article has no idea and mixes everything.When I have a while I will search the Singapore, to see if I find something serious.

Anyway, we carry in this non -invasive measure for at least 30 years (since the time of the pendra), and nothing that has really worked, most, cheated.The sensors of now are not bad;The problems they give are not to wear a small filament in the skin.

Cristóbal Cortés said:

jordiv said:
Do you know about the subject? Link

It shows that the one who has written the article has no idea and mixes everything.When I have a while I will search the Singapore, to see if I find something serious.

Anyway, we carry in this non -invasive measure for at least 30 years (since the time of the pendra), and nothing that has really worked, most, cheated.The sensors of now are not bad;The problems they give are not to wear a small filament in the skin.

Indeed, it is a new study to detect markers (glucose, lactase, urea) in sweat, by microSeres that detect change of color of a reagent.Everything that the Spanish article says is in a note (of course, propaganda) of the university: Link SFVRSN = 1aae254_1

Here is the original article: Link is not accessible, if someone wants it, to ask me).It is a proof of concept, something quite far from a sensor in tests for its adoption in real therapy.E.g.The subject is asked to run, sweat and work with lasers on the sample separately, and so on.Although the motivation is mentioned that the current methods are bad-malls (the punctures of the glucometers, and the sensors are "rigid, expensive, and they have to take a long time" (????)), it is not demonstratedWhat advantage have their devices in these aspects.In addition, they use reagents that are consumed/degraded, that is, the duration will also be limited, such as current sensors.And only study variations;From the relationship of glucose content in sweat with the capillary or speak (if, reasonably, it is like glucosuria, often fucking disaster please).The article only talks about the ability of its method of detecting variations in sweat finally, the "100 times" precision is another propaganda barbarity than someone asks for it, I explain it, it is a bit long.

Anyway, that too many scientific articles are written today, those of especially biomedicals and those of biotechnology that is fashionable, even more.And I reaffirm the lack of need for a non -invasive measure.What problem is there to carry a filament in the skin 7 or 14 days?- What I would like is that they were more precise, they would last more or fail less, I do not need any non -invasive measure, unless there is any of these problems, and it does not seem to be the case.