For a diabetic person, these tension levels are high.
Regarding Merformina, I've been using it for two weeks and I'm afraid I'm going to give it up.My time in range has dropped to 67% and I usually have it at 75%.The hypoglycemias are much more intense and at first I did lower the slow rate quite a bit but now I need more or less the same again.I don't think it's worth it to go down a couple of units.
I'm getting ready for the bomb, I think that after so many years of evolution this is what's right now.
Greetings to everyone.
DM1 desde 1990 - Fiasp y Toujeo - HG: 6,1
nigiri said:
@nigiri said:
For a diabetic person, these tension levels are high.
Regarding Merformina, I've been using it for two weeks and I'm afraid I'm going to give it up.My time in range has dropped to 67% and I usually have it at 75%.The hypoglycemias are much more intense and at first I did lower the slow rate quite a bit but now I need more or less the same again.I don't think it's worth it to go down a couple of units.
I'm getting ready for the bomb, I think that after so many years of evolution this is what's right now.
Greetings to everyone.
According to current protocol in db the limit is 135/85, the lower the better, of course, but that is the maximum level.
No signature configured, add it on your user's profile.
@meginer it cannot be simply based on diabetes yes or diabetes no.
You have to take into account the years of evolution of the disease, your age, whether you have other risk factors, the habits of the person in question... That tension would be correct, not good, for some diabetics, but it is not at all advisable to have those levels.
DM1 desde 1990 - Fiasp y Toujeo - HG: 6,1
@nigiri said:
@meginerIt cannot be simply based on diabetes yes or diabetes no.
You have to take into account the years of evolution of the disease, your age, whether you have other risk factors, the habits of the person in question... That tension would be correct, not good, for some diabetics, but it is not at all advisable to have those levels.
Let's see nigiri, obviously every treatment and examination must be individualized but there must be a guide, a consensus, a protocol, by which to be guided in general terms so that doctors can guide ourselves.Afterwards, of course, each person is different and when it comes to evaluating treatment yes or no, it will depend on many other factors, but the general protocol today and in Europe, tells us that for the general population it should be </ 140/90 and yes there is a differentiation for the diabetic population in general which is <135/85, somewhat less than the non-db population.That is so and you can search for it.
Another thing is, as you say, to individualize the risk of cardiovascular events due to blood pressure and see if that specific person should have the lowest blood pressure for whatever reasons, but we are talking about general protocols for the non-db and db population.
No signature configured, add it on your user's profile.
If I don't have to look for anything, that tension is not optimal tension, whatever the protocols or the Pope of Rome say.You also talk to me about consensuses that are taken, as you say, in a general way and that is how our hair looks for the general population.Doctors have been wrong on more than one occasion in my long history with this disease and I no longer talk to you about hypothyroidism, which is a real bullshit.But come on, for you little bitch, if you are calmer with those levels of tension because a protocol tells you so, it seems sensational to me.
DM1 desde 1990 - Fiasp y Toujeo - HG: 6,1
nigiri said:
@nigiri said:
If I don't have to look for anything, that tension is not optimal tension, whatever the protocols or the Pope of Rome say.You also talk to me about consensuses that are taken, as you say, in a general way and that is how our hair looks for the general population.Doctors have been wrong on more than one occasion in my long history with this disease and I no longer talk to you about hypothyroidism, which is a real bullshit.But come on, for you little bitch, if you are calmer with those levels of tension because a protocol tells you so, it seems sensational to me.
I'm not going to get into any more discussions, I've already told you that you have to individualize at all times.But it's like considering a fasting blood glucose level of 98 as normal, it is generally accepted but not in pregnant women (nor in pregnant women with DB).Each case must be evaluated separately, of course.
No signature configured, add it on your user's profile.
According to Google's AI this comes out
Lada enero 2015.
Uso Toujeo y Novorapid.
Well, before I retired there were times when I reached 15 - 9
And since I retired I haven't reached 12 _ 7
It was the stress.
Hija de 35 años , diabética desde los 5. Glico: normalmente de 6 , pero 6,7 la última ( 6,2 marcaba el Free)
Fiasp: 4- 4- 3 Toujeo: 20
@Nigiri
I am type 2 but with a depleted pancreas, that is, I use it slowly and quickly, and also metformin, which was the first thing they prescribed me.I can assure you that it is very noticeable.One day I forgot my metformin and the insulin I take has no effect, without metformin I would have to take it twice as fast.You'll see when you try.
DM 2 con páncreas agotado desde diciembre 2020. 51 años entonces.
HG diciembre 2020: 15.9. Última HG: enero 2025 6,1
Abasaglar 10 unidades. Metformina, 1000/0/1000. Humalog junior: 2 unid en desayuno y luego en función de lo que coma.
I'm still with her, I'm going to wait a little longer, it seems like I'm feeling better for a few days, but I have made the decision about the bomb.In February I have a check-up with the endocrine specialist and I will tell you.
If I don't manage, I can always go back to the feathers.
DM1 desde 1990 - Fiasp y Toujeo - HG: 6,1
