High cholesterol

Good morning, I just arrived from the visit with the endo, young and rude more could not (I had never visited me), it will have risen with a bad foot ...
Anyway, he told me that I have the cholesterol at 230, that being diabetic would have to be below 100, but that now I do not obsess this ... I have already told him that I do not like red meat, or sausages, as notBe the morning butter .... The truth that I have never had high cholesterol, but says it is produced by the same disease.The same thing happens to you?Do you know something that can take that is natural and help to download it?
I still have no access to my analytics, but it says that perfect gyrose 6.5, that the data of my sensor at 90 and peak percent are excellent.I don't see her so perfect either, the last era of 6.1, but was not in the work of discussing good morning with someone so unpleasant .... next month I will have a visit with the technology educator to have a first contact.With the bomb, I understand that it is because they will grant it to me, but I have not asked him either, because it has been so extremely edge.

Has anyone tried this product?

It is quite outrageous to finding antipatic professionals, which we have enough with what we have and we don't go for pleasure.
It is true that you have to have the lowest cholesterol, but below 100 ... is it not excessive?(Of course I have it in 130 and my head doctor told me that you had to have it at zero, you really cannot say more nonsense ... to zero? I say that for something the cholesterol will serve ... in factIt has important functions).
Have you not given you guidelines to lower it?

@isabelbota no, it has not given me any ... the truth that I have been removed to ask anything, weight now 55kg, I mean that I have no abdominal fat, I have a size 36. I have never been so badly attended.In fact I have asked him to recommend an expert dietitian in diabetes to put a diet and not lose weight and very dry has told me that social security does not finance it, to look for the Internet .... Of courseI have said that I didn't care that I was payment, and he has not answered me.

Of course, one stays when a professional of that guy is.A little empathy, please ...
In the last analytics I had 180 cholesterol and they sent me atorvastatin, but I had to leave it because I was not going well (muscle aches).Let's see how I have the next analytics and what tells me.He also told me that it was by the diabetes itself.He had never had high cholesterol, always pulling low, and weight 59 kg (some Michelin, but not much abdominal fat, hahaha).

Cassie said:
good morning, I just arrived from the visit with the endo, young and rude more could not (I had never visited me), it will have risen with bad foot ...
Anyway, he told me that I have the cholesterol at 230, that being diabetic would have to be below 100, but that now I do not obsess this ... I have already told him that I do not like red meat, or sausages, as notBe the morning butter .... The truth that I have never had high cholesterol, but says it is produced by the same disease.The same thing happens to you?Do you know something that can take that is natural and help to download it?
I still have no access to my analytics, but it says that perfect gyrose 6.5, that the data of my sensor at 90 and peak percent are excellent.I don't see her so perfect either, the last era of 6.1, but was not in the work of discussing good morning with someone so unpleasant .... next month I will have a visit with the technology educator to have a first contact.With the bomb, I understand that it is because they will grant it to me, but I have not asked him either, because it has been so extremely edge.

I also fell the "gift" of cholesterol.I have always had it perfect;Even when I left the hospital in my debut and overcome ketoacidosis.
It does not have much to do with what you eat, it is produced by the liver.If you lower the intake of fatty foods, it will produce more and keep the level.It is more effective to practice, especially force.
My endocrine prescribed me atorvastatin with a cholesterol value of 235, but I am not taking it.I am exercising strength and more physical activity, I did analysis in December and soon I will have the consultation to see how it is evolving.
Statins are very controversial and cholesterol is a necessary, but not sufficient condition, for atherosclerosis.I told him that I did not trust that medicine becauseIn addition to life, as chronic.
He replied that the statins "have saved thousands of lives" and that they are safe medications.
I don't trust.
I don't want to become a polymedicated chronic patient.I also have hypothyroidism (subclinical moment) and it will have to take Euritox at some point.
There is an indicator that is APO B (Apolipoprotein A1) that is more related to cardiovascular risk than cholesterol itself.In the next consultation, I will ask the endocrine to include it in the analytics, we will see if he listens to me or send me around ...
Your endocrine is edge but at least it has not given you an alarmist message.Mine is educated but pulls protocol and recipes you the damn statin because "statistically" is good.According to him.
There is scientific literature in the opposite direction.
That product you have published seems to be packaged.Look at the composition, it puts nothing concrete or understandable, except the aromas.
Let's see if someone has taken it and tells us something good.

@ENSALADA, I have not mentioned the atorvastatin at all, in fact I have read you here and I do not want to take it either, so I thought of something more natural, or what would I have to do to download it ... I had no idea thatThe exercise of force helps to download it ... to see where I get time to do with two small kids and work ...
God everything twists with this happy disease, but I am calmer to see that it is not something particularly mine or my diet ... the same I am a bunny of the Indies and I try it, total for taking it I do not think it loses anything and says thatIt is also effective with glucose.

Cassie said:
someone has tried this product?
https://www.diabetesforo.com/discusion/20939/opinions-metecod

METARECOD OPINIONS
Hello,

Today I saw a TV ads of Metarecod says that it helps with trilice and glucose.

Has anyone tried Metarecod and can give an opinion about them?

Thank you!...

@Diabestico Thank you!Well, it seems that someone has not gone so badly and there is another person trying it ... that it seems to sell human because I do not say no, but if the specialist does not advise me or tells me anything, but I do not obsess me with him ...I am going on !!

Eye!!!!That my endo has told me that I have it great to 210 because the "bad (LHD)" I have it low and the "good (HDL)" very high, the 210 is the sum of both.

Nor case, what you have to have is the LHD below 100. This is what the medical schools say.And the HDL above 40.

How ignorant this lady !!!

Simvastatin is the genetic they send to all

Thank you @ruthbia because until I unlock the analytics, for now, I cannot observe those values.I will be waiting for them, to see if there is luck and shed more light.

Cassie said:
@diabetic thank you!Well, it seems that someone has not gone so badly and there is another person trying it ... that it seems to sell human because I do not say no, but if the specialist does not advise me or tells me anything, but I do not obsess me with him ....Apañada I go !!

They have tables where they measure the risk depending on age, the years of diabetes, cardiovascular accident history and the cholesterol level.For diabetes, the LDL must be below 100. But those figures are not an absolute truth, in fact, they have changed and each time they put the bar more difficult and every time they are placed before statin.
From what I see, the endocrine never "prescribes" exercising beyond walking, however, immediately the medication marked you.
Your endocrine is being prudent, has pointed out that cholesterol is altered, does not consider it worrying and does not prescribe anything, for now.In the next reviews it will take it into account.
In these channels you have information on the topic cholesterol with natural alternatives for control
Borja flag
Dr Larrosa
Potential life

ruthbia said:
eye !!!!That my endo has told me that I have it great to 210 because the "bad (LHD)" I have it low and the "good (HDL)" very high, the 210 is the sum of both.

Nor case, what you have to have is the LHD below 100. This is what the medical schools say.And the HDL above 40.

How ignorant this lady !!!

Simvastatin is the genetic they send to all

In the previous analytics, cholesterol came out in 190 and I didn't mention anything at all.

In the latter it has come out in 189, with HDL in 62 and LDL in 100

Tomorrow I have the appointment with the endocrine, to see what he tells me.

@ENSALADA THANKS!I will look at them ... I have sent me another analytical for July (every 6 months) I thought it was one year old, but well, I appreciate the control ...

Well that, since I am a diabetic, 8 years to!I have cholesterol above 200, but the very low LDL.Before it did not exceed 160 in the total counting.It makes me analytics every 6 months and always looks at me, and the same family.Both have the same criteria

I also have the ferratin, but my endocrine does not give importance.
I had left the neutropenia, but in the analytics last month it has come out again.

Never before the diabets had had total cholesterol beyond 150. But as a result of the diagnosis not under 200. According to my bike partner, endocrine, these are the data so that our cholesterols are considered ideal levels.Regardless of whether we have a total of 170 or 220 of total cholesterol:

Total cholesterol / hdl <5
LDL / HDL <2.5
Triglycerides / hdl <2 (the lower they are, the better)

As it tells me, these parameters are those that are currently being verified more than the previous medical definitions about cholesterol.

Well, I already have the results hanging:
LDL (bad) 141- It has to be & lt; 130
HDL (good) 84- It has to be & GT; 50
Triglycerides 67 -It has to be & lt; 150
Total: 238 -It has to be & lt; 200 (although I don't know why he told me that diabetics below 100)
Conclusion I'm a bit passing ...
The truth that the hematologist has asked me for the most complete analyzes that can exist, 7 pages !!I continue with my anemia (for varying) the most normal.
On Tuesday I will go to a center specialized in diabetes, to see if they illuminate me and put a diet in conditions, what worries me the most is not to continue weight ...

@Cassie are not so bad.
And the weight is a matter of eating more.Do not be scared with hyperglycemia, eat what you need and get more insulin.
My technique is to put more insulin than the habitual if I am around 180 (2 units), if I am above 220 I correct with 3 units and I wait 40 min to eat what it touches with the corresponding insulin.
I have plenty of kilos, I pass them to you 🤣

Cassie said:
Well I already have the results hung:
LDL (bad) 141- It has to be & lt; 130
HDL (good) 84- It has to be & GT; 50
Triglycerides 67 -It has to be & lt; 150
Total: 238 -It has to be & lt; 200 (although I don't know why he told me that diabetics below 100)
Conclusion I'm a bit passing ...
The truth that the hematologist has asked me for the most complete analyzes that can exist, 7 pages !!I continue with my anemia (for varying) the most normal.
On Tuesday I will go to a center specialized in diabetes, to see if they illuminate me and put a diet in conditions, what worries me the most is not to continue weight ...

Diabetics below 100 the LDL
I have seen that on different website there are "cardiovascular risk calculators" where you put the values ​​that ask you and tell you what your risk is.
For example
Link
It does not replace the specialist's criteria, but guides you to see if your cholesterol is worrisome or not.