Joaquillo said:
Isabelbota said:
Joaquillo said:
Joaquillo said:
Hello!I am very happy!
How I told you in first test a month ago Di 154 on an empty stomach, after ten days with diet and exercise as I told me a medical one I did second test, and I said on 114, ten days later I had dropped with respect to the first test from 94 kilos to 88, I measure1.84, and I made another one on an empty stomach and Di 108, the glycosilada gave me 7.2.
Recently I have done two tests in Pharmacy, one on an empty stomach and another after two hours of lunch, say on fasting 86!, I have lowered at 85 kilos, and at lunch I did my first test after eating two hours after lunch, ate peasted dish with ham, onion, garlic, virgin olive oil, carrot and an egg, of dessert orange tangerine andA natural Greek yogurt without sugar, a bit of whole wheat bread and a small red wine glass, two hours later I tested and said 103!.
My conclusion is that I had no prediabetes as I believed, less diabetes, but would not answer my pancreas!I simply had some overweight that caused insulin resistance but the pancreas responds well, except to have diabetes, my doctor was right in not giving diabetes diagnosis and not prescribing pills, but diet and exercise, this demonstrates should not prescribe pills if you don't give twiceOn an empty stomach, but diet and exercise and more tests, regardless of glycosiladI will get glycosylated within three months to confirm as my doctor said.
I think doctors recipe pills in these cases as mine are wrong, my pancreas responded well, and perhaps the first test came that because I had dinner at that time towards, with white bread and industrial juice, but I have managed to catch it in time and eliminateThe risk that my pancreas would work badly over time, if my pancreas was wrong, it would not have had these results, it was also indicative that since the beginning I had perfect triglycerides and cholesterol, what I had is a problem of resistance to diabetes perhaps but not because of mypancreas that is fine but for some overweight, and the sugar was a little high because of the food it had.
This is my conclusion, if I now give 85 on an empty stomach and after lunch two hours later I give 103 my pancreas is fine and I am neither diabetic nor prediabetic.
If you pay attention to mine and do not give twice above 128 on an emptyance, try it with diet and exercise and lower weight, if it does not work then perhaps pills because it would be somewhat evil.
Inside three months I will do the glycosilada to confirm as a doctor said, but I am sure it will even be below 5I would ask you to write things once, not for several threads.With one we already read it.
I'm glad you are happy but in 3 months you tell us glycosilada you will not convince us of anything with specific values.The food does not always climb the same, maybe at two hours you are at 100 and at three in 170. This is diabetes and that is only seen with a sensor that measures you continuously.
The one you have taken juices and bread should not give high glycemia.A healthy pancreas compensates perfectly.In fact, the typical diabetes test is to give glucose (I don't remember how much, but much) and non -diabetics lower it at all.If there is any problem, it takes to go down.
But well, that better that you are happy and that you are still healthy, but please do not repeat yourself everywhere that you go crazy.Thank you.Hello, I apologize if it bothers you that by saving time we used the same text to answer two people in two threads created by me.
I respect your opinion and thank you to rejoice, but I still think thatEverything indicates my pancreas it works well, if I agree that I must confirm it with more tests, but I have been made from that first that was high and none is high, included after food as I said.
Yes, when you do glycosilada then I will comment.
So far I have preferred to move on the subject, but I will tell you one thing: at two hours to me many times I also get well.But ... you know what?that if I measure me at 3 or 4 hours I have often higher.Here nothing is accurate ... and as a very good internist once told me, medicine is the most inaccurate science that exists, not all bodies are equal and 2+2 are not four in most cases.
That said, for me the issue is closed, each one is very free to do what they want with his body.What I would ask you is that there are no false hopes to people who are scared here and ignoring everything and that you can think that what you say is true ... I told my doctor, with a link included, the doctor who saysThat only fasting glucose and his response matter, it was more or less "very well, if you want to test. You have been, except once, fasting glucose below 125. Your glycosilada does not fall from 6,9 (And no, not as sweets just because they have never called me, juice just to overcome a hiccup, usually all grilled or roast, I walk what I can ...) and that can give problems in a few yearsOnly on an empty stomach, it is throughout the day "and no, they don't give me glucometer or strips.Nor of course Contino Meter (which possibly takes me shortly, at least one season).
Until next time