I am a little worried because I have no analysis until the end of September and I have done the HBA1C test in the pharmacy and they tell me that I am 7.3.
I use the Abbott sensor and in the graph I have 6.2.
Does the sensor change so much regarding a test in the pharmacy?
In my daughter's case, she changed 5.9 in the 6.1 sensor in the analytics, but only this time has data. Now the sensor is at 6.1 and we will see the analytics, which touches him in November. That doubt also gives me to think to me, although it sometimes compares with the capillary and usually goes well.
Hi Paz, the pharmacy is like the one that makes you the nurse on the finger that takes 15 min, usually gives 2 tenths above.I have it of analytics once a year and other visits to the endocrine make it finger. In my case, the free makes me louder because it usually measures glycemias higher than the real ones, but the last sensors are measured well below, so it is an orientative value., Calculate 2 up or down with respect to what the sensor tells you.
peace said: Hello everyone, I am a little worried because I have no analysis until the end of September and I have done the HBA1C test in the pharmacy and they tell me that I have 7.3. I use the Abbott sensor and in the graph I have 6.2. Does the sensor change so much regarding a test in the pharmacy? Please if anyone knows, tell me. Thank you very much
Hello, I had my first appointment with the endocrine on Friday 8th and I punctuate my finger to do it, it came out 7.5, while the sensor estimated is 5.7 a couple of months ago when I was diagnosed with DM1 the analytics gave 11.6 in September also alsoI have analytics.
peace said: hello everyone, I am a little worried because I have no analysis until the end of September and I have done the HBA1C testIn the pharmacy and tell me that I have 7.3. I use the Abbott sensor and in the graph I have 6.2. Does the sensor change so much regarding a test in the pharmacy? Please if anyone knows, tell me. Thank you very much
Hello, I had my first appointment with the endocrine on Friday 8th and I punctuate my finger to do it, it came out 7.5, while the sensor estimated is 5.7 a couple of months ago when I was diagnosed with DM1 the analytics gave 11.6 in September also alsoI have analytics.
Well, here is an explanation.Due to the dates you do not have 3 months with the sensor and glycosilada is a result of 3 months.In this case therefore it is not comparable to the analytics.
DM 2 con páncreas agotado desde diciembre 2020. 51 años entonces. HG diciembre 2020: 15.9. Última HG: julio 2024 5.8 Abasaglar 9 unidades. Metformina, 1000/0/1000. Humalog junior: 2 unid en desayuno y luego en función de lo que coma.
I get 6.7 in the sensor and in the analytics 2 weeks ago I got 6.6
Generally blood tests always gives me something less than the sensor.I do not know what is due the disparity of readings from one person to another with respect to the analysis and sensor.
ruthbia said: Hello Paz, that of the pharmacy is like the one that makes you the nurse on the finger that takes 15 min, usually gives 2 tenths above.I have it of analytics once a year and other visits to the endocrine make it finger. In my case, the free makes me louder because it usually measures glycemias higher than the real ones, but the last sensors are measured well below, so it is an orientative value., Calculate 2 up or down with respect to what the sensor tells you.
And that difference of +/- 2 tenths ... affects the pattern of treatment?I mean the UIS.of insulin (both slow and fast).Let's see if to take that difference into account ... I am sucking more than I owe or less than I owe! Don't be scared ruthbia! : S
Debut Diabético en 25 JUL 2018 (DM2) causada por pancreatitis crónica :'( Tratamiento antidiabético: Insulina lenta TOUJEO SoloStar + Insulina rápida NovoRapid FlexPen Seguimiento y Control de Glucosa: Sistema FreeStyle Libre 2 (ocasionalmente glucómetro y tiras reactivas Contour Next)
@Lucero The Freestyle system gives guidance values, as well as the capillaries (although they approach more to the real value in blood) I have been using them for 6 years and only 4 or 5 have measured correctly and close to the capillary value, the rest all unreliable approaches.That is why the glyce they give is orientative. If it gives you 6%, you can be between 5.7 or 6.3 that it is a good value, the important thing is that you do not reach 6.8 in Free because you can go from 7 and we must be below.
ruthbia said: @lucero the freestyle system gives guidance values, as well as the capillaries (although they approach more to the real value in blood) I have been using them for 6 years and only 4 or 5 have measured correctly and close to the capillary value, the rest all unreliable approaches.That is why the glyce they give is orientative. If it gives you 6%, you can be between 5.7 or 6.3 that it is a good value, the important thing is that you do not reach 6.8 in Free because you can go from 7 and we must be below.
Thanks for the info.I will talk about this matter with the endocrine doctor (and with that of the MAP) to know if it takes into account which are orientative data when paying the treatment.Although I imagine yes, since she establishes the guideline according to the data she receives on screen via freeView in real time.
Debut Diabético en 25 JUL 2018 (DM2) causada por pancreatitis crónica :'( Tratamiento antidiabético: Insulina lenta TOUJEO SoloStar + Insulina rápida NovoRapid FlexPen Seguimiento y Control de Glucosa: Sistema FreeStyle Libre 2 (ocasionalmente glucómetro y tiras reactivas Contour Next)
The guideline is followed at the beginning, over time you become independent and tests yourself.You don't need the endo for control.You know what to put on, when going up or down the basal. Moreover, a diabetic knows more and is better known than its endocrine or header doctor.