As ga commented several times.There is a tendency to find glucose readings that are wrong.
In the photo that accompanies this comment you can see two readings taken at the same time, I must clarify that the clocks are marking different but it is because one was programmed and the other does not, as to the exact time.Even so, 9 minutes apart between them, it should not give different without intake.Which of the two readings is correct?
To answer that question, I must take into account, the time I have been without eating and the activities of the day.And above all, how I am feeling.
Well then.In this case in the photo, I had just arrived from working, and had not ingested more than a 7 -oun and “pork rind” malt, a scrap food that does not contain sugars like 4 ounces as three hours earlier.In practical terms
S It is assumed that my reading was normal to low.But he read me 163. Me
I said ok, that's to check.So I took the second reading with the same bleeding but in the other meter and gave 107. This is where one has to take care and get to know each other.In mathematical terms with a 163 without eating, because I
I can put 6 insulin units to take me to 100 that without having the second reading of 107, which would mean that the sugar would lower to about 47 mg which is dangerous.
That is why when they give me abnormal readings, I
I assure that they are quite similar or close.163 to 107 is a lot, but if I don't make a second sample, what could happen if I injected me quickly?I share this to be attentive and not faithful to teams because the teams fail.