A fat -rich diet can help lose weight

It favors good bacteria for the intestine.It may include fats and proteins, against what is usually recommended;No, on the other hand, elaborated light products or too much fruit.

No fruits and butter yes to lose weight?A controversial, but effective diet.

When a patient arrives at Grayshott Spa, in London, he receives a description of the diet that will have been for a week that simply contradicts everything that is considered healthy.Some things will not get too much attention: you must leave caffeine, sugar, alcohol.Others will be more strange: you must leave milk and wheat.No more refined carbohydrates like white rice.But a lot of animal protein, and a lot, a lot of fat.

The program "is part of a growing health movement in the world that argues that many of the diet recommendations that governments and nutritionists have given in the last 50 years are wrong," wrote Sarah Gordon, editor of the Financial Times (FT) that was submitted to the Grayshott diet week."Low fat, far from being healthy, is bad for people, and reducing calories does not result in sustainable weight loss," he added.

Decades ago, obesity and type 2 diabetes are epidemic in developed countries and in those that had an economic boom, such as China or India.And the message of the low -fat diet has done a lot of damage because people believe they take care of themselves but, in reality, they ingest more carbohydrates without knowing it.That opposes weight loss and adds environmental factors to genetic for the multiplication of diseases such as cancer or coronary heart disease.

"The regime does not imply refraining or depriving food," describes Grayshott on its website."It implies not eating certain foods that can irritate the walls of the intestine."The importance of stimulating good bacteria and eliminating the bad - create a positive microbiome - to facilitate digestion, achieve better nutrition, maintain stable health and normal weight.This spa puts it into practice, at a cost of between £ 1,495 and £ 2,245 for that week in which the functioning of the body is restarted.

"Our approach is to create a maximum impact on the digestive processes of the body," follows the web."All foods are prepared as they remove pressure from the digestive system, allowing it to rest and heal.essential for adequate digestion. "

The products that help reinforce the microbiome, such as yogurt, kefir and kimchi, are part of the restart diet."But other capital elements that are advised are more surprising," Gordon wrote."It is central to eat large amounts of fat and good quality animal protein, including double cream and red meat."Neither grains nor milk: instead, proteins, fats, some fruits - any at any time, for its sugar content - vegetables, seeds and nuts.

Although the program was created to improve microbiome, it had unexpected but positive side effects: increase in patient energy levels, decreased blood pressure, better glucose regulation and, consequently, less medications for hypertension andDiabetes.Some defenders of this diet believe that a good intestinal flora can protect people against heart attacks and even Alzheimer's evil.

The main problem that this approach stumbles is the information rooted in common sense about what is good and whatIt's bad to eat."Avoiding fruits but eating butter goes against everything they have taught us," the author synthesized.Tim Spector, author of The Diet myth and professor and researcher at King's College London, told the FT: "Dietary recommendations tell us that we eat less fat, less sugar or less protein, and yet most diets failIn the long term. "

If a dietary product replaces fat with carbohydrates, it does not cut the vicious circle of greater weight, worse health and more appetite.According to Gary Taubes, a specialist in scientific issues and author of El Case against sugar, there is a correlation between the food industry, official nutritional recommendations and the increase in obesity."The fear of fat - signed, in particular - is based on scientific knowledge of the 1960s and 1970s, and simply does not support the light of the most recent research and the state of the current art of science," he wrote.

That generates huge confusion.Fruit juices are supposed to be good for children, but even the organic seem to be bad: too much sugar.The nutritional pyramids of developed countries put fat at the top (which must be consumed in moderation) and at the base the grains (of which you can eat between six and 11 portions per day).

In addition, modern life makes these foods avoid: skimmed products, dietary sodas, cereal and fruits bars are among the most consumed with the awareness that something good for health is done.However, they are not the favorite foods of good bacteria, and for each human cell a person has nine other microbiome cells that inhabits it.

There are those who oppose this perspective.Gordon cited an Ed Yong article, another specialist in scientific issues, published in The Guardian: without removing value from microbioma, discusses the generalized perception that there lies a magical response to all health problems."It has been linked to an absurdly long list of evils, which include Crohn's disease, colon cancer, allergies, arteriosclerosis, autism, asthma, Alzheimer's…"

However, the National British Health Service has seen, ”said the FT - that patients with a high protein and fat diet and carbohydrates had" a spectacular improvement of their symptoms "and even a numbness of type 2 diabetes.