{'en': '"They had never discriminated me for being diabetic until I wanted to oppose"', 'es': '"Nunca me habían discriminado por ser diabética hasta que quise opositar"'} Image

"They had never discriminated me for being diabetic until I wanted to oppose"

fer's profile photo   01/19/2016 9:27 a.m.

Obviously, it is also documentary falsehood to say that you do not have a disease if it is a cause for exclusion, I would not, but once they have appointed you an official, does not put anywhere that it is loss of the condition of this, because obviously you do not notThey can expel and, as I say, another thing is that you decide to introduce yourself to another and be a reason for expulsion, in that case, in the other they can tell you that there is nothing to do, but in which you have your appointment they would no longer haveNothing to do if they decided to expel the person for that and would be more than lost the courts before because it does not appear that these diseases for illness must be maintained, right?

Anyway, the issue of renewal I do not know how it goes, if in your case because it is not influence, yes, because they are a criminal record and it is a requirement that they ask for

The issue of exclusions for health reasons for certain things, so that they are subsequent to the appointment and expel you, is that one is not in conditions for example of doing field work andassigns another job, that can be done perfectly.

Nila's profile photo
Nila
11/17/2016 10:19 a.m.

Diabetes desde 03/15
Lantus
MODY 3
HG octubre 2021: 5,7; junio 2021: 6,5; 2020: 6,7; 2019: 6,7. 2018: 6,4

  

We are going that what I mean is that the internal promotion in your case to the GC is normal to exclude you for that, but it should not harm you in your current work since if you are diagnostic subsequently diagnosed to your appointment, you should not worry whyThere is no documentary falsehood anywhere, because the date is prior to you knew.

Nila's profile photo
Nila
11/17/2016 10:21 a.m.

Diabetes desde 03/15
Lantus
MODY 3
HG octubre 2021: 5,7; junio 2021: 6,5; 2020: 6,7; 2019: 6,7. 2018: 6,4

  

Yes @nila, that I will not worry me, I have it clear unless things change here, also for example you go to the call of the Local Police, to the part of medical exclusions and only say this:
"any disease, condition or alteration of physical, psychic or sensory nature
that, in the opinion of medical doctors, prevents, limits or hinders the exercise of
Police functions. "

And I say ... this affects us ??, in what kind of disability are we encompassed?
More than anything because it is a whore, with forgiveness, studying the entire local police ageLose time in vain.

eliastp's profile photo
eliastp
11/17/2016 1:05 p.m.
No signature configured, update it from user's profile.

  

P.D: Today places have come out for customs guards and again we were out of being able to oppose ...

eliastp's profile photo
eliastp
11/17/2016 1:06 p.m.
No signature configured, update it from user's profile.

  

I have a question, to oppose for childhood education teacher, are there restrictions?I have the doubt and as the call does not come out until March or so.I asked my endocrine in case I had 33% option and told me that it was very difficult, that a series of conditions had to be gathered, such as recurrent hospital admissions and complications derived from diabetes to recognize something.Let's see if you can solve something.

IreneMV's profile photo
IreneMV
11/17/2016 1:19 p.m.

DM1. Debut: 1998 / Bomba de insulina 2007 / Últ. glico.: 6,7% febrero -2018 / Sin complicaciones.

  

Education, Justice and General Administration, which I know, no exclusion, although it is true that at the end of the process we have to have a medical certificate that says you are suitable to perform the functions, but for a diabetes, nobody is going to put you.

As for disability, I doubt that 33% are achieved except what your very specific case doctor says, you have to also pass interviews with a psychologist, social worker ... They also look at you the family unit, all that gives points to calculate theDisability level.In the case of diabetes, I think you have to have enough difficulties, a hospital income number within a given period, etc.

Nila's profile photo
Nila
11/17/2016 2:13 p.m.

Diabetes desde 03/15
Lantus
MODY 3
HG octubre 2021: 5,7; junio 2021: 6,5; 2020: 6,7; 2019: 6,7. 2018: 6,4

  

Thank you so much.Yes, that's what I read.As you say, we are in a limbo administratively speaking.

IreneMV's profile photo
IreneMV
11/17/2016 2:58 p.m.

DM1. Debut: 1998 / Bomba de insulina 2007 / Últ. glico.: 6,7% febrero -2018 / Sin complicaciones.

  

Join the Discussion!

To participate in this thread, please register or log in.