Chihuahua.- Parents denounced before the National Commission of Human Rights the rejection of their child in ordinary nursery number 1 of the IMSS, located on Ortiz de Campos street of the San Felipe neighborhood, because it suffers from diabetes, diabetes, diabetes,
On September 5, 2012, my son Andrés EmilianMexican Social Security, located on Ortiz de Campos Street #901 in the San Felipe neighborhood.
Before the diagnosis, Fabiola Iracheta Ventura, the mother of the child, headed before Rosa Ana Nevárez Ortiz, director of said nursery, to inform her about the diagnosis of Andrés Emiliano, as well as the treatment indicated by the doctor.
According to medical treatment, my son had to receive subcutaneous insulin doses and review blood glucose levels.
However, Nevárez Ortiz refused to follow the treatment and discharged my son of the nursery service, although I had affiliation to IMSS.Subsequently, it was explained that diabetes does not represent a risk for the rest of the children because it is not contagious and that medical treatment could be performed by nurses assigned to said nursery.However, the director refused to provide her with the service arguing that they could not apply any injection to the children and directed us with Irma Sicairos Beltrán, coordinator delegation department of nurseries of the IMSS state delegation.
When reviewing the case with Sicairos Beltrán, she pointed out that the service could not be provided to my child due to her illness because in the nurseries there is no medical service and the nurses assigned to each of them are not trained for thetreatment that requires, that is, they are incapacitated to review blood glucose levels and supply insulin.
In the same month of September, the IMSS delegation in the state of Chihuahua, gave us a resolution in which we tried to found why did not provide the nursery service to my son, determination that founded in internal provisions for other illogical and interpretedto the interest of the IMSS, overlooking the provisions of our Constitution and international regulations which must be applied by the authorities of our country, having committed to do so by signing the different international treaties, particularly in relation to the Convention on the Convention on theRights of the child in articles 1, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 18th, paragraphs 2,3, 26 and other provisions applicable in this regard.
Because of this, in November 2012, we decided to file a complaint with the National Human Rights Commission because by denying the service to my child, they are discriminating against their illness.The complaint was recorded with the CNDH folio/5/2013/10883/Q.
It was until April 29, 2016 when a meeting between Cristian Rodallegas, delegate of the IMSS in Chihuahua, Héctor Tanus, coordinator of the foreign office of the CNDH, Sid Durán, Technical Coordinator of Attention to Complaints and Public Information, public information, public care coordinator, public information,And we, parents of Andrés Emiliano.
However, during the meeting the main theme of the complaint that is the discrimination that my son suffered by denying the nursery service was not reviewed.Among the established “agreements” after the meeting, they indicated that they will inform us about the advances of the criteria for the admission or permanence of the minors in the IMSS nurseries, as well as in the realization of an international comparative study on the inclusion of children withDiabetes in child care and care systems.Only general details of the case were considered, but in no way was it examined conclusively forSolve the problem of discrimination incurred by the IMSS by denying the nursery service to my son because of the disease he suffers.
Since the admission rejection of Andrés Emiliano suffered by discrimination of the IMSS in the nursery, we had to erogworking mother as an affiliate to IMSS, causing a serious economic and moral problem, since we had to make efforts to solve that expense, being that he had the right to be in an IMSS nursery, however, he was discriminated against by suffering a problemHealthTherefore, we demand that the National Human Rights Commission issue the recommendation corresponding to the case, in which a flagrant violation of our child's human rights occurred, as well as those of the working mother, we must remember that no internal regulations of any institutionIt is above our Constitution.More than three years have already been completed with six months of the complaint registration and no resolution has been issued, despite the fact that during that time it has been requested by different means, our complaint is given.
Gentlemen of the National Human Rights Commission, how much more do we have to wait for a case as clear as the flagrant violation of the rights of our youngest son and the working mother?
.