If you had hemovitreo and you were vitrectomized, it seems clear that
You had advanced diabetic retinopathy.The one that has been developed
a cataract in one eye and not and the other, speaks of the fact that in one eye, the
surgical trauma was greater, and this condition
determinant, the greatest development of the cataract.Obviously, if the
Cataract outside the responsibility of diabetes, you would have the same in both
Eyes since both are affected in a similar way.I don't know if this
Answer your comment.If not, I am at your disposal
fsp4434 said:
@fsp4434 said:Hello companions, in April I operated from cataracts.I neither intend nor want to give or take away anyone: I am diabetic I want 11 and now I have 59, I had hemovitreists and I was vitrectomized of both eyes between 16 and 17 years ago.The fact is that in one eye a cataract deteriorated my vision to me while in the other it was incipient.For the background the ophthalmologist who opened my story to me to the retinologist of the center who made a lot incapitted in the issue of diabetes control and that I did not know a case of cataract with such a late appearance after vitrectomy.In conclusion: I want, and I repeat: I want to believe, that the severe cataract is a late consequence of the intervention, because if the issue were for diabetes I would think of a similar evolution.
I put the best intraocular lenses available and the result is spectacular, so I consider that it is not worth waiting.
Health@s.