As Maritxu22 says, the Dexcom can put it wherever you want, although officially it can only be put in the belly (I usually take 95% like this and perfect), in the arm you can also, I have even seen in calf ....Each is a world.
about the "the only thing" that lacks is being continuous measurement, of course ... it is the only thing ... and it's all ... it is of no use to put a ferrari on four tacos, without wheels ....No?.And about the Apaños, they are that, Apaños, that in the end you find another problem that is to bring those devices (which are not small) above the sensor ... come on, a disaster ... and everything to get what many doesThere are years, continuous measurement.
If Abbott had the Navigator 2, which was continuous measurement as it has to be ... but it is seen that it is more on account to all Spaniards (the Americans no longer scare them even if they are trying), than to give us whatWe need.The free is very good for a Lord older type II .... for your information ... but for a type I it is an apparatus, I will not say useless, because more useless are the strips, but inappropriate.
Of course each one has its pros and consAnother "roll" (unfortunately we are going to eat it with potatoes in the SS), to me that "depends" on each person, does not strain me ... do not understand me badly, in your position economic issues can beDecisive, but to control our diabetes (type I, type II forward with free ... it is for that) McG is needed ... then allergies issues, because there I do not enter, hey, there are people who some sensor irritates theskin and can't ... it's a physical problem.It can also be the case of people that the sensor lasts 7 days, and that is Caríiiiiiiiii.But on operation it does not depend at all ... "That is a trolley like a tail pian... Tips I sell, but for me I don't have ...
Things are as they are ... we have mcg´s ..... and we have strips and free.Type I diabetic, need MCG.Type 2 diabetic needs strips and/or free ... It is my point of view and for my experience.
And I have seen how free has gotten into social security, and how 95% of people only know free, and speak of free as a revolution, when it is a mere product of marketing.I insist, remember that Abbott could have followed the path of continuous measurement, I already had technology, the Navigator I and II (they sent measurements every 5 minutes to the receiver, alarms, graphics, etc ...), but it happened I suppose to whatIt gives really pasta, that it is a mediocre product, that we do not need, and that place it in social security.Simply.If Abbott stopped "nonsense" and took out a Navigator III would be applauding with the ears, for the best we now had it in social security (patch, transmitter on top, and send data to the receiver or mobile), and not the devicethat we have not for us (type I)
Maritxu22 ... the issue of the cost of the annual transmitter ... you can "amortize" even more (there is a community behind which you can make yourself a receiver, you can "reuse" the transmitters, etc ...).Everything is to be wanted to use continuous medication, but with a little "hand" the costs are not theorists, they are less (free, for what it does, it is caríiiiiiiii, it may be cheap, but not economical) ....And the quality of life if it is the fiancee and very far from what they call (marketing) measurement "flash", on demand and I do not know what more name could put "coaching measurement" or "freelance measureI have been the latter, it seems last technology).To me, between the issue of freeStick with shoe, and "dogs" detect hypoglycemia (as a substitute for technology ... of free, of course, it is normal, they complement each other perfectly), they make me bad ....
But it is my opinion and experience, of course, very personal.greetings