Physical exercise is good for everyone to have diabetes.A couple of posts without saying it and it seems that there is some confusion, I will have to put it in this and the following (if there is more) to avoid those confusion.
@owash I do not know where you get that I have a vision where only glycemia matter, but not only for this thread, in any post of my forum.
In this thread I have been talking about how the exercise affects the DM1 and I have spoken mainly about two things that I have labeled as "feeling" (upward scrolling bar and can be read) and "insulin dose" (displacement barup and can read) and in those two things I do not talk about glycemia.
From slippthat monitor more) is an improvement (always from the point of view of DM1).
Out of that I give an explanation about insulin sensitivity and errors because someone has (or had) a wrong idea about that (upward scroll bar and can be read) and in principle that explanation has nothing to do with whatExercise and DM1.
Regarding the phrase that you highlight in blue, that phrase does not have an explicit way or implicit anything of that supposed vision that only glycems matter, that phrase says absolutely nothing more than what is in it.
Moreover, at the end of everything you have said, it can be interpreted that if you have DM1 and you do not have any of those other problems (cholesterol, t.a., overweight, ...) you end up opinion almost as those that we think that theExercise is overvalued as a tool for the treatment of DM1, because exercise supposedly helps those things but if you don't have those things ... Anyway ...
Like other things in this world of diabetes sometimes the same thing must clarify it if you are talking about that thing and DM1 or if you are talking about that thing and DM2.
Example: Eating common sugar, a type 2 must be told that it escapes whenever you can of rapid absorption carbohydrates (bone, better not coma) but a type 1 does not care (you can eat it without problem).
The same thing according to a type 1 or a type 2 has a nuance, because with the exercise the same: for the DM2 the exercise personally seems very good and in that case if I put it at the same level of other things (such asthe treatment or diet) but only if we are talking about exercise and DM2 for DM1 putting it at the same level as the treatment or diet seems excessive to me, for the DM1 doing exercise is fine but we do not flip it.
Does the exercise harm any type of diabetes?No, come on ... I don't think.
Does it favor all types of diabetes?(This is a good question, namely what is the answer).
You end up reading many times "Exercise is good for diabetes", "exercise is good for diabetes", "exercise is good for diabetes" ... but nobody specifies anything, neither the type of diabetes or anything.
@Gondrovo when reading the common sugar you can rescue that story that you have told several times "in the eighty -beak year they told me no and I is what I do" it is worth, you are very free to do what you want but I imagineThat after the years you have realized that what they told you is a "no, because not" but well ... what I wanted to tell you is something referring to that analogy of the chair and the four legs and such ...
When you are within this, too many brochures, pamphlets, mini-guides even posters, all those educational things, that "the four legs of a chair ...", "the four fundamental pillars ... "," The four wheels of a car ... "By force of reading itYou end it by storing even the minimum as a PQ spring "until it sounds good" (my case is or was the four-wheel) and the years go by and more brochures, more pamphlets, more mini-guias and endsReading more posters or the same posters more times (more consultations, more times in the same waiting room with the same posters, in short ...) do not fool yourself, it is not our harvest at all, we are recorded but recorded butOur is not.
With this I do not say that those four things that refer to do not exist (education, treatment, diet, exercise) that exist, what would squeak me is that those four legs / pillars / wheels are the same size and I think thatWhen these brochures, pamphlets, mini-guias, posters are created, what they try.
Over the years I have been seeing that the most important thing (and therefore should be represented with larger size) is education, treatment and diet have a slightly lower size than education and are linked to each other (and with education)And finally the exercise has the smallest of everyone's size and would link it at least with education, all linked to education, everything emanates from education (in the average DM2 education fails and with that it fails everything as sure you have been able to verify andIf in a DM1 education fails then you are almost in them and surely you have also been able to check it).
When trying to represent that (which seems to me a more real representation) in brochures, pamphlets, mini-guias, posters, what gives me: a chair with four different legs (which does not stand standing), four pillars of different size (whichThey do not use even to decorate) and a car with four different wheels (that sure or starts) and of course ... that does not "sell", that does not come so easily, what comes is the other.
I say this because I was one of those who jumped like a spring repeating as a parrot about "the four wheels of a car ...", I have seen that you are more of those of "the four legs of a chair ..."For my part for a long time I try not to do it, but there is each one with what he does with the common sugar 8).
No signature configured, update it from user's profile.
