TNT, don't know what you are going.Why do you always have to speak attacking?Why do you get a topic that you don't even interest and judge people who are interested?And finally, why do you have to talk about all the issues even if you have no idea?I can't understand what you want.Maybe, if you could not allow it, the system is shit and it is better that anyone has it.
I am not going to give their opinion if the continuous meter is the solution or not (although I have taken it half a year and at least I have an opinion with some foundation ...).Only that nonsense you have said:
because there are people to whom each sensor lasts less than 7 days is a lie, first because if he fails before the seven days they change it to you for a new one, only one failed one and came a messenger gave me a new one and took meThe old man.The truth is that no sensor (apart from the one I fail) has lasted less than 2 weeks ... and the estimated price per year is 1920eur.
If you are looking in my messages, you will see that it was very criticism with Novalab (the company that supplies it) that I have always told the truth about this system and it is true that I have not put it for four months because I have had a lot of extra expenses and did not have the optionto buy it.
There are several things that I don't understand ...
As much as I review my interventions in this thread (they have been two interventions, it is the third) I do not see that I am attacking or judging or insulting anyone or anything like that, in both interventions I think I express myself quite correctly.
In my first intervention I have only given an opinion related to the costs of a continuous glucose monitoring system, in my second intervention I deepen a little more in that same opinion and comment on a couple of things that do not make a continuous glucose monitoring systemby itself.
I have not said at any time what I think of a continuous glucose monitoring system itself, or if I am interested in it, I have only given an opinion related to what it costs, it is an opinion like any other (neither better nor worse)with which you can coincide or not to coincide and that it seems that it is an opinion with which the large majority of users who have intervened and are intervening in this thread (in fact even the person who dedicates that post coincides in some way withthat opinion for what he comments in the final part of the post).
That regarding my interventions, with respect to the person who dedicates that post:
One of the things that catches my attention is that I do not remember having had any conversation or private or public with this person (private conversation I can assure that I have not maintained any, public conversation I cannot assure 100%, I would have to review all myPosts in this forum to be able to ensure it but what I can assure is that if we have ever coincided in some thread this person and I have not attacked or judged or insulted or anything like that).
I say so that there is a bad vibes and that it comes from afar, I personally have no idea where this comes out.
Another of the things that catches my attention is that it might seem that this person is taken as personal attacks opinions that are somewhat "contrary" to a system of continuous glucose monitoring (say that it is expensive or that it is invasive or similar)If this were the case, this person would have a more or less serious problem but it seems that this is not so since if a full thread is ehaKed, it can be seen that there are quite a lot of opinions like that (which in a way they are "contrary") andHowever, this person does not jump for any of them, he has only jumped for one, mine.
Maybe this person has some kind of fixation with me, I repeat the same, I have no idea where this comes out.
Let's see tica (I think it's the first time I godirectly to you) in that post that you have dedicated to me you do precisely the things you accuse me, attack me and judge me.You attack me by directing me and saying that I attacked people in my posts (or that I am very aggressive in my posts or I do not know what you intend to imply) and judge me for example when I enter to value about whether I have orI have no interest in something or if I have or have no idea of something.
It is a bit wrong to accuse someone of doing something when you are doing something that is precisely.
I answer you:
- I have not attacked anyone or anything like that, I have only given an opinion.When you find opinions that you don't like the best you can do is ignore them.
- I get into the issues that I have interest or that I directly feel like this is an internet forum _publico_ and any user can participate if you wish in the issues you want and on the other hand ... I have not judged anyone.When you find things that are difficult for you to read the best you can do is ignore them.
- I participate in the issues you want (well because you have an interest or because I feel like it or pq directly to me) since this is not the "private preserve" of ethics, as I have already said, this is an internet forum _pubico_.
A advice that would give you would be to take a tila or a Valerian before posting that are things that go quite well for the nerves and so on the best if you are a little calm you can tell me where that bad roll comes from that makes it inThe first post in which you go to me are so "pleasant."
-----------------------
For people who are entering to comment on this "controversy":
I think that to comment to comment on the "controversy" you have to read all the posts of the "controversy" before, I recommend reading calmly all the posts of the "controversy" that are few and especially I recommend reading this very calmly.
I have only given an opinion related to the cost of a continuous glucose monitoring system, it is an opinion like any other, which also gives the circumstance that most of those who are intervening coincide, I have not yet read anyone say whatOtherwise (which is one of the things that catches my attention from this "controversy", it is an opinion that most share but nevertheless there is "controversy" ...).
Be careful with the syllogisms in plan "If you say something negative or contrary to ... you are against ..." PQ can take error, at no time have I said what I think of a continuous monitoring system itself and I have notSaid if I have one or if I have ever had one (maybe there could be some surprise ...).