What a free free and free freestyle

I am doing great with Diabox, that's why I don't want 3, I tried it once and I didn't see any advantage except size.
And it is also not compatible (I think) with Diabox and my watch so I stay that way.

meginer said:
I am greatly with Diabox, so I don't want the 3, I tried it once and I didn't see any advantage except size.
And it is also not compatible (I think) with Diabox and my watch so I stay that way.

With Diabox or there has been something that I do not know from Christmas or is not compatible, proven.That's why I continue with the 2 ...

Well, my sensor will have touched me very bad because no matter how much it calibrates it, with Diabox, there is no way to approach the accuracy I had with free3.

When I think I have calibrated it well, it fails me again in the hypos or hyper.

They will probably end up changing it at 3 in the SS too

ruthbia said:
puts you that sensor not available, measure in 10 min "or something.

Now that I go in the middle of the sensor (7 days).I continually fail these.Both in Diabox and FreeLink.And always in the most necessary moments.

Another thing that never happened to me in the free3.

Well, I remember that the beginning was discourage4, Cura de la Diabetes None but sensors to fill the pockets well, many sensors

rogerix said:
... It is a matter of time that changes to 3 everything progresses and from 3 will pass to 4, cure of diabetes none but sensors to fill the pockets well, many sensors

You are right, it seems that the diabetics aspire little.Instead of a healing or similar.We only ask for insulins and less bad sensors.

But the treatment is so exhausting, that I would finally settle for an insulin that acted according to blood sugar (such as the article that was published here recently)

And not having to be watching, correcting and fearing.

That would be great, such as not being diabetic.
Because the problem is not what non -diabetic people think, who believe that the worst is to puncture, the difficult thing is to hit the moment and quantity.If the insulin acts depending on blood sugar ... another rooster would sing, goodbye problems.

That would be a dream an insulin that acts only depending on blood glucose when it goes up, we would only be diabetics because we would have to prick, that article put it Fer but long ago and for that there was a lot of less than 10 years I thought I read

But it would be an option that would not take money from pharmacists.They would surely win much more.

That is why I see it more possible.

Or simply a pill that does not allow cells to absorb more glucose than normal.

It must be something that in addition to money does not take away other types of benefits such as the money they earn with the diseases produced by diabetes for evil or regular control, at the same time impact on treatments and generates beautiful paste, the cureFrom the disease in economic terms it is unfeasible, it is health terms is already a flour from another sack

What I do not understand is how it is possible to remove the pancreas and survive but not cure diabetes.
Eye, I'm glad those who live without pancreas but before they said it was vital and that medicine was not very advanced because it is a very difficult multifunctional organ.And I speak 10 years ago.

ruthbia said:
what I don't understand is how it is possible to remove the pancreas and survive but not heal diabetes.
Eye, I'm glad those who live without pancreas but before they said it was vital and that medicine was not very advanced because it is a very difficult multifunctional organ.And I speak 10 years ago.

My father died in 2010 of pancreatic cancer.When they detected it they told the family that the transplant was not an option, which was an organ that could not be transplanted.

Diabox sent it to the trash directly, as FreeLink took continuous readings.It is of no use to juggle with calibrations, if the results that your SS doctor takes, are those of LibreLink.Lost of time and counterproductive to carry the disease.The changes made by the doctor are the ones that have to take for the results that come via freeLink.If you are on another way ......

Hello to me sometimes the free 2 measures well and sometimes I do not give one I am talking about the sensor 300 and that the capillary marks 150 if at 48h it does not measure me well I change it.The 3 I do not think it is ever more expensive.I am from Barcelona and in 2 months they will finance the Dexcom G7 to whom the free 2 measures fatal like me and will last 14D is small and I think it measures better.

yaizaj said:
hello to me sometimes free 2 measures well and others do not give a one I am talking about the sensor 300 and that the capillary marks 150 if at 48h it does not measure meWell change it.The 3 I do not think it is ever more expensive.I am from Barcelona and in 2 months they will finance the Dexcom G7 to whom the free 2 measures fatal like me and will last 14D is small and I think it measures better.

Do you expect 48h marking you badly?What a whore.

The 3 costs exactly the same as the 2, at least on the Abbott website.

The G7 looks good.

viking said:
diabox send it to the trash directly, as freeLink took continuous readings.It is of no use to juggle with calibrations, if the results that your SS doctor takes, are those of LibreLink.Lost of time and counterproductive to carry the disease.The changes made by the doctor are the ones that have to take for the results that come via freeLink.If you are on another way ......

If it is a roll, the truth.The first days I was fatal, I was more aware to calibrate it well, than to monitor my glycemia.And since then it has not gone too well, I do not detect the hypos well and out of fear, I am always 130 or above.

Because they only gave me a couple of sensors, that if I did not throw it in the trash and put a new one until I found one that went well with LibreLink.I am also tempted to buy the free3 that never failed me and stop rolls.

viking said:
diabox send it to the trash directly, as freeLink took continuous readings.It is of no use to juggle with calibrations, if the results that your SS doctor takes, are those of LibreLink.Lost of time and counterproductive to carry the disease.The changes made by the doctor are the ones that have to take for the results that come via freeLink.If you are on another way ......

viking said:
diabox send it to the trash directly, as freeLink took continuous readings.It is of no use to juggle with calibrations, if the results that your SS doctor takes, are those of LibreLink.Lost of time and counterproductive to carry the disease.The changes made by the doctor are the ones that have to take for the results that come via freeLink.If you are on another way ......

Well, teach your endocrine the measurements of LibreLink and capillary, see that there are many times a big difference and if it is governed for that to see if you have a good control or not, or to modify a treatment, Aviado you go ...
I don't care if it's continuous, if you can't calibrate with hair, it does not work for me, and it is not worth me to bring the PQ standard calibration, it is not seen.Abbott's commercial in my area told me and I showed it that no, integrated calibration at all.