LibreLink and free sensor with error

Good night,
I have a small consultation that may seem a bit rare but you would do me a favor if someone tries to try it.

I have basically changed my sensor and has given me a fatal error.As I know these mistakes I have waited half a day and tried to read the sensor with another device and go, magic, it works.

The problem is that the device I was using still does not work because I do not know what kind of logic they have implemented but once fails once it is impossible to read the sensor with that device.

I would like to work on the device that I usually use because that's where I keep all the data and I have to show them to my doctor through the application (not by Libreview).

So, I wanted to try to close the device and reopen it, in case the problem was solved, but at the same time I do not want to lose all the old data that I have stored.

Has anyone tried to do something like that?

And has it worked?

I know it is a bit strange question, but I am honestly tired of free sensors2 to work in this way, I swear I don't understand, and I would like to use my normal phone to read the sensor.

Greetings and thanks if anyone tries.

You can download the data in Excel from Libreview, it is the only option.LibreLink does not allow importing data.
Your ruling is due to the Android version, I don't think the solutions are closing.

ruthbia said:
You can download the data in Excel from Libreview, it is the only option.LibreLink does not allow importing data.
Your ruling is due to the Android version, I don't think the solutions are closing.

Yeah?I did not know that they had solved it for other versions of Andriod.Well, it could be worse.Thanks anyway.If you can't play it so as not to lose what I already have.

Not being able to import data from LibreLink is a whore.I just changed mobile and have lost all the previous data.
I know that on the web, with Libreview, all the data is still available, but it gives me courage not to have them directly on my mobile.
With Diabox I have not had any problems to import them all without losing anything.

@25Mar2000 You can install diabox and teach the doctor's data.It gives much more information about Libreview or LibreLink.
My doctor likes much more

Believe a Nightscout account and upload the data with Diabox or XDRIP.Most doctors love all the data that can be seen and just consulting a website.

mrasra said:
believe a Nightcout account and upload the data with Diabox or XDRIP.Most doctors love all the data that can be seen and just consulting a website.

The truth is that I have never dared to create an account in Nightscout, but because of how little I have seen it looks like a fattening (and it is not that I consider me excessively clumsy)

Yesterday was the penultimate day of my daughter's sensor and gave her a value of 60, and 140 with the capillary.
The last days it works badly, and I no longer know if all the time, because the glyce raised, 6.4 the sensor and 6.8 the analytics.
Can be fixed with Diabox calibrating?How often do you calibrate?

He tried to put it once but the data was going.
Let's see if he tries again.
I hope that 3 measure better.

regina said:
yesterday was the penultimate day of my daughter's sensor and gave her a value of 60, and 140 with the capillary.
The last days it works badly, and I no longer know if all the time, because the glyce raised, 6.4 the sensor and 6.8 the analytics.
Can be fixed with Diabox calibrating?How often do you calibrate?

He tried to put it once but the data was going.
Let's see if he tries again.
I hope that 3 measure better.

I usually calibrate Diabox several times the first 3 or 4 days and then it usually stays well.
Right now the capillary marks me 110, Diabox 106 and LibreLink 72.
Logically, from LibreLink, I trust little and nothing.

@Regina I calibrate 3 times the second or third day and nothing more.Then it remains.The first day is not worth it because it is in "adaptation."(They don't give me strips so saving the first day)
My glyc was 5.8 Diabox, FreeLink 6.1 and analytics 5.6.
This means that FreeLink in my case measures above my real glycemia and with Diabox I get better approximate to my glycemic state.

regina said:
yesterday was the penultimate day of my daughter's sensor and gave her a value of 60, and 140 with the capillary.
The last days it works badly, and I no longer know if all the time, because the glyce raised, 6.4 the sensor and 6.8 the analytics.
Can be fixed with Diabox calibrating?How often do you calibrate?

He tried to put it once but the data was going.
Let's see if he tries again.
I hope that 3 measure better.

When the sensor gives these values ​​at the end of your life it can be an error of the readings and in my experience it is better to change it.I think the problem is that the reaction it has ends, because for what I have investigated if the pile gives problems directly stops reading, it does not give bad readings.

The issue of calibrating is very interesting because there are studies that say that Abbot's default calibration does not give super accurate values, although it is true that they are ancient studies and they are supposed to change the algorithm continuously.In my experience it usually measure me, but I see that there are people who happen to you so who knows.The problem of calibrating with blood values ​​is that you should do it when the level is stable so as not to create problems with the difference in time between blood value and interstitial, apart from that I recommend that you gauge when the sensor takes a couple of daysPost, because sometimes at the beginning of the sensor reads strange things, like day 3 in my experience is already stable.

regina said:
yesterday was the penultimate day of my daughter's sensor and gave her a value of 60, and 140 with the capillary.
The last days it works badly, and I no longer know if all the time, because the glyce raised, 6.4 the sensor and 6.8 the analytics.
Can be fixed with Diabox calibrating?How often do you calibrate?

He tried to put it once but the data was going.
Let's see if he tries again.
I hope that 3 measure better.

It has happened to me lately with several sensors, although the difference was around 50, ending the sensor around the seventh day and having to replace it.If you can calibrate with Diabox but it is complicated, also when you differ so much I do not know how to calibrate with Diabox, it happened for example that Diabox gave 98 glucose and from there down there it stays in a straight line in such a way thatYou can be 95, 80 or 40 and Diabox continues to mark 98, does not give lower readings.Above 98 or the minimum that is if it gives similar values

Sensor installed on Wednesday, yesterday giving the error of "try again in 10 minutes."
Today it does not give connection errors but marks me 50-60.Compared to three different glucometers.
Now I am in 158 calibrated with Diabox and the FreeLink 98 app.

The normal thing for my experience is that it marks about 20 approximately but this difference is a pass.

Even Abbott's reader/glucometer, used with the blood strip, which usually marks about 20-30 less, is marking about 30 more than the app.

Do you claim a new sensor to Abbott when it gives such great differences?

Another thing, when do you have those differences communicate it to your doctor?I say it because when I see the graphics almost always in hiccups it will hallucinate.He will think that we are hurrying to the fullest, when it is not.

Sandman said:
sensor installed on Wednesday, yesterday giving the error of "try again in 10 minutes".
Today it does not give connection errors but marks me 50-60.Compared to three different glucometers.
Now I am in 158 calibrated with Diabox and the FreeLink 98 app.

The normal thing for my experience is that it marks about 20 approximately but this difference is a pass.

Even Abbott's reader/glucometer, used with the blood strip, which usually marks about 20-30 less, is marking about 30 more than the app.

Do you claim a new sensor to Abbott when it gives such great differences?

Another thing, when do you have those differences communicate it to your doctor?I say it because when I see the graphics almost always in hiccups it will hallucinate.You will think that we are hurrying to the fullest, when it is not.

I believe that you claim with differences of 30-50 tell you that for them it is reasonable.When they have so much difference they usually expire to me before 14 days and then I claim it, while trying forward, adding, calibrating and using the glucometer more

Well, go cloth say it is reasonable.The same is to be in 90 than with a hypoglycemia of 40, or that in 150 than in 200.
As they notice that they do not suffer.
I understand a 10-20 difference (I have 2 one touch verio glucometers and they never mark the same.-300) would seem good, but not in normal values ​​(90-140)
Before I had the strips for the One Touch but 3 or 4 months ago they took them from the recipe.
Right now I'm going to make an appointment from my ambulatory nurse to try to be re -prescribed.

sandman said:
Well what cloth say it is reasonable.The same is to be in 90 than with a hypoglycemia of 40, or that in 150 than in 200.
As they notice that they do not suffer.
I understand a 10-20 difference (I have 2 one touch verio glucometers and they never mark the same.-300) would seem good, but not in normal values ​​(90-140)
Before I had the strips for the One Touch but 3 or 4 months ago they took them from the recipe.
Right now I'm going to make an appointment from my ambulatory nurse to try to be re -prescribed.

With the first one that began to give me some differences of more than 40 I call to claim and they told me what @javiertenero comments, which are acceptable values.An Abbott nurse explained that if I kept raising the difference I called again, when they went from 100 the next day I called again and they made the replacement (asking me to send the defective), since then when they begin to give great differencesIt gives time to call it for it, they always give a sensor error and tell me to change it before.

But for calling and asking the only thing you are going to lose are 10 minutes.

The graphics for the doctor is something else, according to mine I am dead all the time since they do not rise 45-50 according to the sensor, what I do is that I make the capillaries with the reader so that they are reflectedOn the page.

Let's see that the sensor does not seek precision, it is orders of magnitude.Stability ranges, so Abbott changes from high variability.
It doesn't matter to 80 as 140 if in this range we do not rectify with insulin.The same as between 180 and 240 when we use the same units to rectify.
The only exact blood analysis is.

With Diabox, sometimes, you have to erase the calibrations and start over because the sector is reset to day 5 for example and begins to change its variability.

ruthbia said:
to see that the sensor does not seek precision, it is about magnitude orders.Stability ranges, so Abbott changes from high variability.
It doesn't matter to 80 as 140 if in this range we do not rectify with insulin.The same as between 180 and 240 when we use the same units to rectify.
The only exact blood analysis is.

With Diabox, sometimes, you have to erase the calibrations and start over because the sector resets to day 5 for example and begins to change its variability.

I do not agree.It doesn't matter to 80 than 140. A 80 if I am hungry as, at 140 no.A 80 salts to do different sports than 140 ...
And I correct myself different from 180 than to 240.
We already know that the only thing is the blood tests but the sensor has to approach.In my case it is usually quite accurate, except the first day, so I do not see normal when someone tells those differences so great, that for me they are important.
@Sandman
I believe that once I claimed a sensor for measurement differences.As I knew the story I exaggerated a bit (if the glucose gave 150 and the sensor 100 because I said that the sensor gave 60 and so ... 😉).They changed it to me.

Isabelbota said:

ruthbia said:
to see that the sensor does not seek precision, it is about orders of magnitude.Stability ranges, so Abbott changes from high variability.
It doesn't matter to 80 as 140 if in this range we do not rectify with insulin.The same as between 180 and 240 when we use the same units to rectify.
The only exact blood analysis is.

With Diabox, sometimes, you have to erase the calibrations and start over because the sector resets to day 5 for example and begins to change its variability.

I do not agree.It doesn't matter to 80 than 140. A 80 if I am hungry as, at 140 no.A 80 salts to do different sports than 140 ...
And I correct myself different from 180 than to 240.
We already know that the only thing is the blood tests but the sensor has to approach.In my case it is usually quite accurate, except the first day, so I do not see normal when someone tells those differences so great, that for me they are important.
@Sandman
I believe that once I claimed a sensor for measurement differences.As I knew the story I exaggerated a bit (if the glucose gave 150 and the sensor 100 because I said that the sensor gave 60 and so ... 😉).They changed it to me.

Is that right now the glucometer gives me 140 and the sensor marks 71.
I put the sensor just 2 days ago, I don't think I will improve the thing.
I think it is defective even if it does not have connection errors or anything.
At two at noon something curious happened to me that had never happened to me:
For 12 minutes of clock followed (which are 12 measurements, let's go), FreeLink gave me 53 and Diabox 109. Every minutes the same numbers unchanged.As if I had reached a stop or something.I don't know, something very rare.
So I'm going to enter the web and I'm going to claim a new one.
This one looks like at any time will leave me lying.

sandman said:

Isabelbota said:

ruthbia said:
ruthbia said:
to see that the sensor does not seek precision, it is treatedof orders of magnitude.Stability ranges, so Abbott changes from high variability.
It doesn't matter to 80 as 140 if in this range we do not rectify with insulin.The same as between 180 and 240 when we use the same units to rectify.
The only exact blood analysis is.

With Diabox, sometimes, you have to erase the calibrations and start over because the sector resets to day 5 for example and begins to change its variability.

I do not agree.It doesn't matter to 80 than 140. A 80 if I am hungry as, at 140 no.A 80 salts to do different sports than 140 ...
And I correct myself different from 180 than to 240.
We already know that the only thing is the blood tests but the sensor has to approach.In my case it is usually quite accurate, except the first day, so I do not see normal when someone tells those differences so great, that for me they are important.
@Sandman
I believe that once I claimed a sensor for measurement differences.As I knew the story I exaggerated a bit (if the glucose gave 150 and the sensor 100 because I said that the sensor gave 60 and so ... 😉).They changed it to me.

Is that right now the glucometer gives me 140 and the sensor marks 71.
I put the sensor just 2 days ago, I don't think I will improve the thing.
I think it is defective even if it does not have connection errors or anything.
At two at noon something curious happened to me that had never happened to me:
For 12 minutes of clock followed (which are 12 measurements, let's go), FreeLink gave me 53 and Diabox 109. Every minutes the same numbers unchanged.As if I had reached a stop or something.I don't know, something very rare.
So I'm going to enter the web and I'm going to claim a new one.
This one looks like at any time will leave me lying.

That is what happened to me with the defective departure, at times he stayed in 53 hours without varying.Sometimes, when this happened to me, in the middle of the night I had to replace it