Good ... the title was long.A subject, for me, controversial and that little is talked about.
I do not know what they think, I do not want to offend any blogger or who informed us day by day of the advances in diabetes, but one thing is to empower and inform, and another is to be permanently showing the use of the new technology that I acquired recently.
I see this modality very much in the networks, of people who carry their diabetes control but carrying new technologies, which in many cases are inaccessible to the vast majority of people with diabetes in the world.
Then, intention is lost, it ceases to be an aid because the posts are useful only for a group and begins to be a narcissistic tool.
There is a Facebook (I am not going to say the name) that manages a mother who has a son with diabetes, yes, that, Facebook is for the son's diabetes but it is not his but the mother who is the one who controls herdiabetes to the child (or so it seems .. (?).
They live in the USA and for posts it is evident that they can access the latest USA technologies whose health system is totally private.
I say "can" and not "can" because diabetes is shared, it is from the mother and him, for what it seems.
The boy, already of legal age, will be stunted with the overprotection he receives, although it is true that the other extreme is also a problem, family and social indifference.
Now, would anyone think of making a Facebook to show how your child has her diabetes using the last and most recent technology?
Who is this Facebook aimed at?
Who does not have a family that accompanies him, the latest technologies and sufficient purchasing power, would you tell this person that a DT1 can also be a high -performance athlete?
The other, overprotection, isn't this mother's prominence about the son's diabetes too much?
Does the boy will have a Facebook of him, person, beyond his diabetes?
And what is the need to show that your child can upload mountains still with diabetes?
Would it be a pathological overprotection that finds the way to manifest in the control of diabetes?
Many questions, but it is clear that the same disorders of humanity, acquire another nuance from diabetes ...
Not to be misunderstood, it is my criticism of overprotection and does not have to be everyone in agreement.It is still pathological although apparently love and care is to be seen.The two ends are bad ..
The other, competition for the best control and for the acquisition of new technologies, has quite exhausted me ..
Greetings,