Cristóbal Cortés said:
sherpa41 said:
I think it is good that it is published to know what is useless and that you do not have to buy it.But still catches you a silly day and you buy it to see it.
Yes, but in the original post I didn't say any of that.On the contrary, and I quote: "they will be able to predict the glycemic index of users."Which is not true, the reality would be rather: "They will be able to give an indirect estimate of glycemia that should be taken with caution and checked with capillary blood glucose meters."
The non -invasive measure has a long history and is something that still does not work.20 years ago, a Swiss company marketed a "clock" meter called pendra .The base was something called "impedance spectroscopy": glucose changes the concentration of skin ions which changes the impedance curve.The device detects this through a high frequency resmitor.
They made clinical trials and the diagram of areas and errors was quite good.Here in Spain there were pirates willing to sell it at an exorbitant price that included your virgin daughters, but Danish Social Security adopted it and gave it to a lot of type 1 diabetics. What happened in practice was that it worked fatally.Clinical trials had not taken into account variability factors in broader populations and many reported incoherent measures.Danish primary care doctors ended up doing studies with their patients, and the resulting diagram was catastrophic.So they removed it and returned to the hair strips.When this was learned, the house broke.Spain did not come.
This topic is much more serious than watchmakes.The supposed advantage of the pendra was not only that you did not click, but the method was theoretically superior to the interstitial fluid (which is the basis of the current sensors).But all that remained in theory.
The theory: pendra.narod.ru/downloads/pressentation_warsaw_110904.pdf
Final result: Link
I insist, in the case of denouncing someone, you should denounce Fitbit, who are the creators of the product, and who have detailed their characteristics.
The only thing I have done in this post has been to show with a screen capture the information that Fitbit gives.It is a post that only informs what there is, without judging what they say, since it has not even come out, so until it comes out, we are nobody to judge their reliability./B>
Honestly, I am sorry for people like you who denounce content without more, and more when I have done it in good faith, with the sole purpose of informing.
Anyway, it seems that in your ideal world, you would be the dictator and all kinds of content with which you did not agree, they would be censored.Luckily the Internet is a free place.
And as a advice, when you want to face a problem, face the root, in this case, to Company Fitbit, not mere informants of the innovations they are taking out.
No signature configured, update it from user's profile.