ruthbia said:
@"aaandres" what I say is that since adults do not cover the abbott free system that the subsidy is made via rent for all, so it will reach morePopulation spectrum.
It has already been done with retirees, according to their pension some pay and others do not.
System aids are granted according to rent.I cannot have study scholarships because at that time it was considered that my parents' rent was high.
I do not think it is the best solution but now the scale is only minor and those cases that an endocrine says.
So, or we like the endocrine taking a black leg or forget about sensors.
The truth is that direct taxes are unfair (Amancio Ortega pays the same VAT for a cocacola that a stop, fair, just ... is not), and the indirect ones is indeed a scale, but they can also be unfair.But today, it is indeed what there is.Now, with the chronicles it should not depend on the rental for anything (because it is already paying according to her, it could not be charged 2 times for the same ... Another thing is that they say that you do not pay social security your quota ...
And I still think that the Free should finance it, but always with others ... the free is obviously the one that suits us with type 1, and the only one who insists on saying that it serves us, is Abbott, smearing to whom he has tospread.That they put on the table Dexcom, Medtronic and Abbott ... and Medtrum if someone wants it (there can always be someone who does well for their adhesive), and each one who chooses (poor Abbott, that little by little that people know optionsand offer them, they do not place a tenth that others).That it is an endocrine who chooses that quality of life provides to a patient, it seems fatal to me ... may decide which is the best treatment, insulins, etc ... but that decides that x has less quality of life than y,,That is not.The quality of life should be we who decided it, and they adapt the treatment.We all like to live well.
And I say that the chronicles should not depend on the rent, it is simple: we can be a source of income without option ... that is ... now we pay for insulin for eg, 10 euros ... if they say you have to pay80 euros, then you have to pay it! And if they say they are 800, because too.That is, our economic capacity is in their hands (government) ... and we have no option to look for alternatives.A chronic, will always depend on the State, what you have to pay ... without option to revolve, to say that if or not ...
What they could do, how less bad, as long as it is not established free, is that if Abbott weed doctors, Santiario system, etc. with a product that is what it is ... and they want to place it how they do, then come, come, we are not going to bother anyone the business and we accept octopus as a pet ...(Simply assuming the difference) that if we need (and you can say an endocrine that you need a free, because I know what I need in that aspect, go if I know, and it is not a free or by Asomo -I insist, I want to live welland have good quality of life-).
That they prefer to use this system to give you things that you do not need or do not work for you, to take and throw them away, and then buy what you need?Well, they will know, but I see it a waste of resources, and personal expense in what we need: that's where you had to optimize ... I can give you this, that for you it does not work, because I do not give it to you, but youI compensate for you to buy what you need (paying your difference), and I think it would be better.Greetings