JPR I do not talk about those differences ... sometimes (and is fashionable) it is said that if one has an error of 11% and another 9% ... for me that is irrelevant ... but alreadyWhen you put the 2 calibrations in the Dexcom for example, with the drop, and the same drop, are you error in the glucometer of a lifetime?one 140 and another 160 by eg.
I mean that there may be (and I talk about everyone), they seem totally secondary.The important thing is the trends and alarms ... Poruqe in the end I give of course they are "reliable", although each person is a world, of course ... I know people that Dexcom lasts little, but many of them.It lasts a lot.Also, over time you know how to interpret perfectly how a sensor is going.As you say ... I could stretch it more than 14 days (2 reset) but to be fighting with him, with?In the end he does not make the function, so already to the second restart I change it (except that I see that it is going very well), but the first ???, outside (and does not usually appear until the 14 days minimum).That is why you have to know it (I suppose that as the Medtronic, even for what they tell me, much more) and over time, you know perfectly where it marks better, where worse, when it goes well, bad ...
I say that a type I diabetic needs a continuous meter, and the free is not ... and alarms, and the free does not have them.
That is useful, yes, if the ss gives it to it, then better than the strips, yes ...
An MCG can deactivate the alarms on demand, if they bother you, do not interest you, or at a given time, if you put them .... that is good.People say that "alarms stress", because you turn them off!
Of course respect your opinion, and surely for you the best is the Medtronic (I insist, I have good comments) ... that it is a real McG, but I do not think that right now you renounce the alarms, having them.Because today, but tomorrow you are interested in putting them ... that's the difference.
I think that both the Medtronic and the Dexcom adapts to any diabetic (which you do not like alarms? Do you turn them off .... that you do not like to see the values all the time? Do not look, do you turn it on whenever you want ....)... Free does not, and it is more, everyone makes the jump from free to these two ... but nobody curiously.No one wonders why?
And how do you say ... and say many "reviews" each one adapts to a person (this is typical of cars tests, where they say that they are all very good, of course, in the following pages you have the advertising of those thoseBrands ... what are they going to say?) ... But curiously, again .... Those who do the reviews always use an MCG with alarms .... Do you not believe that it is also curious, that for them alwaysThe best is that of "alarms", the real MCG ... but for others the free can serve for example?
Free has a lot of marketing ... the free had to be the Navigator II or III Link .... But it is seen that they dedicated the pasta to marketing, intime to the product.And we will all pay that.
What I comment is simply to say that the path to follow is the MCG, the real MCG, is called what is called ... free or should exist, because it has been an ABBott's play as an impressive laboratory, which have put it withShutter (I already tell you, when the free one comes out, the doctor tells me that "see what progress, what just left" (of course, the beautiful traveler had just passed, which would tell him that for every 10 free, he gave him an iPhone)And I freak out if I had been with a continuous meter for 6 years ...
greetings