Diabetes and opposition disability

In this life everyone goes to yours.If you have a possibility, nobody will give up their place for you.Each one who takes advantage of their cards as they want.

maca said:
I am thinking of introducing myself to oppositions and of course I access as a disqualidal I am more likely to get a place.

My question is whether with diabetes, having it stable, someone has given some degree of disability, it does not have to be 33, I am only interested if someone has given something only for diabetes, not for having more things.

And if so, what province?I am from Andalusia and I know that in this community the scale depends on the province not on the community.

Thank you very much for the information!

They gave me 33%, diabetics since I was two years old, I have 32 and retinopathy, the truth is that I don't even understand what they comment, I don't even have any pay, I've been working since I was 20 years old ... The only thing that has lowered meIt is the personal income tax.

I will correct: disability is one thing and another disability.
They will not give you more than 14%.
On the subject of whether it is fair or unfair is very debatable.
Yes as a police, guard or firefighter, etc.You can't introduce yourself, you will need facilities in others, no ??.

Indeed.I just learned that with T1 diabetes you can't be drones pilot.Fear makes me tell my son, who has been planning it from 10 years, and waiting at 18 to do the official course.

maca said:
I am thinking of introducing myself to oppositions and of course I access as a disqualidal I am more likely to get a place.

My question is whether with diabetes, having it stable, someone has given some degree of disability, it does not have to be 33, I am only interested if someone has given something only for diabetes, not for having more things.

And if so, what province?I am from Andalusia and I know that in this community the scale depends on the province not on the community.

Thank you very much for the information!

Hello, I approved last year some state oppositions.In my case I needed 33% and being well controlled they told me that it is almost impossible to get it, so I did not try.

For those who do not agree to ask for the disability, I tell you.I am full defender that a diabetic can make normal life but in the case of the opposition we are at a disadvantage: stress is very uncontrolled, the sedentary life of an opponent harms us, when he had a descent studying he lost at least 2 hours untilThat he took the rhythm, the exams was always very high for fear of a decrease ... taking into account that there are people who, due to loss of audition in a single ear, have 33% yes it seems to me that we also deserve it.

However, much encouragement that without disability is also taken out.

Hello, good afternoon.Having a decrease does not mean that you are invalid or that you cannot work or give you a pay.I have introduced myself to opposition and all were better than some had a very mild kyphosis or lordosis and they had it if you have TDH tb they give it to you etc now do not give it to diabetes give you a 26 that is useless.I consider myself a normal person with some limitation since when you are low you do not yield 100% and if you are in an operation and you are sometimes you say and now that I do etc.Tb if you are driving and gives you a descent you have to stop so as not to kill anyone etc. so that we are like everyone else but with limitations.
Now they will not give you the decrease you would have to be transplanted or at least retinopathy.It is what there is.

Good luck in the opposition and study a lot

Hello maca.

Martae said:
good afternoon.I have a 38 % disability certificate for diabetes and some more things.I am from Valencia.And they gave me the certificate in 2007. I add those two details because in effect they do not make the same valuations in one province as in another.Nor in a time that in another (unfair, I know).Before the year 2000 (approx), just having a diabetes already gave you 33 %.I know some cases.From a few years to this part, they have become more demanding in the valuations.But if you allow me advice, do not give the battle for loss.The best thing is to present not only the endocrine report that takes you, but also all the medical reports that can be made (ophthalmologist, nephrologist, any specialist you go to).Because maybe these reports can add those missing points to reach 33 %.

And what benefits do you have with that degree of disabilities?

Madrid is one of the strictest communities in the assessment of disability.They gave me a disability of 13%, by type 1 diabetes, an eye injury for a work accident.Two years ago I increased more pathologies I included asymptomatic hypoglycemia, (how did not go with my head, nothing happens, I told him that once he was driving with 38 of blood glucose according to the "Free Style), chronic lumbalgia, and others that should haveBe unimportant to them, they gave me up to 18%, I have requested another review but I don't expect anything new.

We are going to be clear, in the works if you say that you are diabetic, they do not hire you.Before they caught you for the mili.Now it does not exist anymore.
I have had to pass medical awards without saying that it was diabetic and with the perfect glucose, so that they would not realize ... for a shit work in a star company, at an airport.And he was a pilot.
This is the thing, in some oppositions, we cannot introduce ourselves for this reason.
Even to be a porter, they wanted to ban the ... less bad than when they vote for Congress, the president of Congress was diabetic and refused to submit him to vote.
The driving card, you have to renew it a lot of times for being diabetic and spending the money ... "If the law is unfair, the right thing is not to obey it" Gandi ... do not say you are diabetic.
They should compensate for the expenses of medicines and the diet we have to do.And for all the discriminations we suffer.
Before when there were fewer diabetics, if they gave you the disability. The minimum, but they gave it.
Now there are many disabled and it looks very bad on TV that finds so many

I asked for it because they suggested it in the company.I have been in DT1 for 33 years and I was operated from my heart after bacterial endocarditis that forced me to put on a aortic titanium prosthesis, so, in addition, I am anticoagulada.I have also had diabetic retinopathy and they have made me laser in both eyes.Although everything sounds very bad I am super good and neither one thing nor the other prevent me from doing my job.What I am going ... in the assessment in Malaga recognized me a 28% disability .Conclusion, it is useless, neither for me in fiscal benefits nor for the company in which I work.

more example ..... What is the reason for, being diabetic type 1 insulin -dependent 31 years already (remembering this crucial detail, nowThat without it it is not survived) / with hashimoto syndrome / autoimmune gastritis, when obtaining and renewing my driving license, only a period of 5 years is granted instead of 10?In addition, is it fair that you should pay the same taxes as those with a 10 -year card?Do we not deserve equitable treatment according to our health conditions?I would appreciate a clarification on this matter.Frankly, I don't think we are considered normal ... for example, if I find myself without insulin or sugar, survive less than a healthy or normal being.

nekgatodulce said:
more example ..... What is the reason for that, being diabetictype 1 insulin -dependent 31 years already (remembering this crucial detail, since without it it is not survived) / with hashimoto syndrome / autoimmune gastritis, when obtaining and renewing my driving license, I only grant me a period of 5 years instead of10?In addition, is it fair that you should pay the same taxes as those with a 10 -year card?Do we not deserve equitable treatment according to our health conditions?I would appreciate a clarification on this matter.Frankly, I do not think we are considered normal ... for example, if I find myself without insulin or sugar, survive less than a healthy or normal being.

It is a very spoken topic in this forum.
No, it is not fair, but that the law does ...

Who invented this strange law and why don't they modify it?If it was done, it is because we are not normal.People with insulin -dependent type 1 diabetes, who need insulin because their pancreas (Langerhans islets do not produce it and have a health problem for life, feel as if they had taken something crucial for their well -being, similar to someone without a handOr one foot.The difference is that they do not receive the same fair treatment as those with problems in one arm, a leg or a hand.The first difference between one and the other is that a person without hand looks at the naked eye, while a type 1 diabetic person is not possible, and some hide it for some unclear reason.Isn't it logical to treat them equitably?Why can't they receive fair treatment like others?

begoirina7515 said:

maca said:
hello I am thinking of introducing myself to some oppositions and of course if I agree as minusvalida I am more likely to get a place.

My question is whether with diabetes, having it stable, someone has given some degree of disability, it does not have to be 33, I am only interested if someone has given something only for diabetes, not for having more things.

And if so, what province?I am from Andalusia and I know that in this community the scale depends on the province not on the community.

Thank you very much for the information!

Madrid, is one of the strictest communities in the assessment of disability.They gave me a disability of 13%, by type 1 diabetes, an eye injury for a work accident.Two years ago I increased more pathologies I included asymptomatic hypoglycemia, (how did not go with my head, nothing happens, I told him that once he was driving with 38 of blood glucose according to the "Free Style), chronic lumbalgia, and others that should haveBe unimportant to them, they gave me up to 18%, I have requested another review but I don't expect anything new.

fjrmad said:

begoirina7515 said:

maca said:
maca said:
hello I am thinking of introducing myself to some oppositions and of course ifI access as a minusvalida I am more likely to get a place.

My question is whether with diabetes, having it stable, someone has given some degree of disability, it does not have to be 33, I am only interested if someone has given something only for diabetes, not for having more things.

And if so, what province?I am from Andalusia and I know that in this community the scale depends on the province not on the community.

Thank you very much for the information!

Madrid, is one of the strictest communities in the assessment of disability.They gave me a disability of 13%, by type 1 diabetes, an eye injury for a work accident.Two years ago I increased more pathologies I included asymptomatic hypoglycemia, (how did not go with my head, nothing happens, I told him that once he was driving with 38 of blood glucose according to the "Free Style), chronic lumbalgia, and others that should haveBe unimportant to them, they gave me up to 18%, I have requested another review but I don't expect anything new.Madrid.

& lt;

For disability the law changed.3 income from severe hypoglycemia per year is needed and now it is reviewed every year.
That is, almost impossible.

@Nekgatodulce you are right in everything but we don't have enough strength to change laws.
I have worked 20 years in aeronautics, the last as diabetics and without problems, I attended tracks on track and others;Now I am in a railway and my only restriction is in work that I cannot climb to heights (it is not my case, I do office work).
The limitations are put RRHH of each company and especially the preventive resource that takes care of us/protects.

Another thing is if you have complications, there they can give you something, more or less depending on the case.
But there it really is better to try some kind of inability to work, normally total (for the absolute they have to be very serious things), more than a disability of such percentage.