Well, we can rejoice that the subject begins to study, but it does not cease to surprise the string of lies that are released, and it hurts that Dexcom's distributors do not enter the subject, denying all the trolley that the means ofcommunication, or entering also with the SS.
And this is an open letter to them ... Why does Dexcom not press to offer his product?If a 1 -year subscription is already about 300 euros ... let's imagine that they manage to hire 5000 subscriptions ... the price would be good.
Or why do they negotiate the Dexcom as a semi -financed alterantiva?
I know that the people of Dexcom from time to time read the forums, and it seems good to me, and I would like to know the answers to these issues.
In addition ... they don't realize ... they have the best product by far (we all know it), but if social security gives free ... because they will lose many Dexcom customers, because on a gifted horse notThe tooth is seen, and there is already the option of Ambrosia to make it continuous measurement (I hope it works well) so we would only have to pay that kit, which would be accessible.
If this is confirmed, it will be a hard blow for Dexcom .... why don't they press?Why don't they inform people, and denied the trolley of the media?Because all that gives a halo of "invention of the century" to free, when it is a bad spot, so clear.
And it seems good to me to give free .... great ... but what happens with those who need continuous medication?
"For two years the diabetics can for the first time measure the level of glucose without the need to click repeatedly a day as until now"
Thus begins the real article, it is sorry ... It is sad that a means of communication do this publire for ... that is a lie, it is a trolley ... 10 years ago we have that and much better.
Who will stop Abbott's feet?Because I don't care about free ... I suppose that in no way the 2 will come out that will be continuous ... perfect and free ... I leave Dexcom and it happens ... but free how such, is an outdated product (I should have left before the first Dexcom), obsolete ... and dare to sell it as a novelty.And on top of that, they deceive the government to finance it ... simply by ignorance of the people, who knows him for marketing.
It seems sad.
Greetings